Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,336.59
    +13.21 (+0.40%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,487.90
    +433.77 (+1.14%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,079.61
    -150.58 (-0.83%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,275.38
    +44.33 (+0.54%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    67,588.15
    -599.27 (-0.88%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,421.05
    -7.51 (-0.53%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,277.51
    +42.03 (+0.80%)
     
  • Dow

    38,686.32
    +574.84 (+1.51%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,735.02
    -2.06 (-0.01%)
     
  • Gold

    2,347.70
    -18.80 (-0.79%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    77.18
    -0.73 (-0.94%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.5140
    -0.0400 (-0.88%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,596.68
    -7.58 (-0.47%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    6,970.74
    -63.41 (-0.90%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,433.10
    +61.35 (+0.96%)
     

Individual investors account for 47% of OM Holdings Limited's (ASX:OMH) ownership, while insiders account for 38%

Key Insights

  • OM Holdings' significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public

  • 50% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders

  • Insiders own 38% of OM Holdings

To get a sense of who is truly in control of OM Holdings Limited (ASX:OMH), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 47% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Meanwhile, individual insiders make up 38% of the company’s shareholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of OM Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

View our latest analysis for OM Holdings

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About OM Holdings?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

Less than 5% of OM Holdings is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in OM Holdings. Gang Huang is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. Marc Chan is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and Ngee Tong Low holds about 9.0% of the company stock. Ngee Tong Low, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of OM Holdings

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of OM Holdings Limited. It has a market capitalization of just AU$394m, and insiders have AU$151m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 47% stake in OM Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 8.6%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Public Company Ownership

It appears to us that public companies own 4.7% of OM Holdings. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with OM Holdings (including 1 which is a bit concerning) .

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.