Advertisement
Singapore markets open in 5 hours 8 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,314.05
    +0.57 (+0.02%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,306.71
    +3.44 (+0.06%)
     
  • Dow

    39,801.62
    -201.97 (-0.50%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,783.61
    +97.64 (+0.59%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    69,763.50
    +3,826.33 (+5.80%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,469.03
    +114.61 (+8.47%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,424.20
    +3.94 (+0.05%)
     
  • Gold

    2,434.60
    +17.20 (+0.71%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    79.79
    -0.27 (-0.34%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4370
    +0.0170 (+0.38%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,069.68
    +282.30 (+0.73%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    19,636.22
    +82.61 (+0.42%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,627.50
    +10.88 (+0.67%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,266.69
    -7,317.24 (-50.17%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,682.78
    +64.09 (+0.97%)
     

Positive week for Black Hills Corporation (NYSE:BKH) institutional investors who lost 12% over the past year

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Black Hills implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock

Every investor in Black Hills Corporation (NYSE:BKH) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Institutional investors would appreciate the 3.5% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 12%.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Black Hills, beginning with the chart below.

Check out our latest analysis for Black Hills

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Black Hills?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that Black Hills does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Black Hills' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Black Hills. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

Insider Ownership Of Black Hills

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that Black Hills Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$21m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Black Hills. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Black Hills better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Black Hills (1 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.