share_log

Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZM) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 57% of the Company

Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZM) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 57% of the Company

Zoom Video Communications, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:ZM)主要由擁有公司57%股份的機構股東控制
Simply Wall St ·  02/13 12:16

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Zoom Video Communications' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 19 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders own 17% of Zoom Video Communications
  • 高機構所有權意味着Zoom Video Communications的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前 19 名股東擁有公司 51% 的股份
  • 業內人士擁有 Zoom 視頻通訊 17% 的股份

A look at the shareholders of Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZM) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看Zoom Video Communications, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:ZM)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲57%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲理想的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Zoom Video Communications.

在下圖中,我們放大了Zoom Video Communications的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:ZM Ownership Breakdown February 13th 2024
NASDAQGS: ZM 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zoom Video Communications?

關於 Zoom 視頻通信,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Zoom Video Communications already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Zoom Video Communications, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Zoom Video Communications已經在股票登記處有機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Zoom Video Communications過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:ZM Earnings and Revenue Growth February 13th 2024
NASDAQGS: ZM 收益和收入增長 2024 年 2 月 13 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Zoom Video Communications. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.5% of shares outstanding. With 7.4% and 4.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, Eric Yuan and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Eric Yuan, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。對沖基金在Zoom Video Communications中的股票不多。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股東,已發行股份爲7.5%。Eric Yuan和貝萊德公司分別擁有7.4%和4.7%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。第二大股東埃裏克·袁也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 19 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前19名股東擁有該公司51%的總所有權,這表明沒有一個股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Zoom Video Communications

Zoom 視頻通信的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$20b, and insiders have US$3.3b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Zoom Video Communications, Inc.的大量股份。它的市值僅爲200億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值33億美元的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會說,這表明了與股東的良好一致性,尤其是在如此規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 25% stake in Zoom Video Communications. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Zoom Video Communications25%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Zoom Video Communications better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Zoom Video Communications you should be aware of.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地理解 Zoom 視頻通信,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。一個很好的例子:我們發現了 Zoom Video Communications 的 2 個警告信號,你應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論