share_log

The Three-year Loss for Avangrid (NYSE:AGR) Shareholders Likely Driven by Its Shrinking Earnings

The Three-year Loss for Avangrid (NYSE:AGR) Shareholders Likely Driven by Its Shrinking Earnings

Avangrid(纽约证券交易所代码:AGR)股东的三年亏损可能是其收益萎缩所推动的
Simply Wall St ·  2023/11/06 11:17

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But in any portfolio, there are likely to be some stocks that fall short of that benchmark. We regret to report that long term Avangrid, Inc. (NYSE:AGR) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 37% in three years, versus a market return of about 20%. On the other hand the share price has bounced 9.9% over the last week. The buoyant market could have helped drive the share price pop, since stocks are up 5.9% in the same period.

为了证明选择个股的努力是合理的,值得努力击败市场指数基金的回报。但是,在任何投资组合中,都可能有一些股票未达到该基准。我们遗憾地报告,Avangrid, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:AGR)的长期股东也有这样的经历,股价在三年内下跌了37%,而市场回报率约为20%。另一方面,上周股价反弹了9.9%。繁荣的市场本可以帮助推动股价上涨,因为同期股市上涨了5.9%。

Although the past week has been more reassuring for shareholders, they're still in the red over the last three years, so let's see if the underlying business has been responsible for the decline.

尽管过去一周令股东更加放心,但在过去三年中,他们仍处于亏损状态,所以让我们看看基础业务是否是造成下降的原因。

See our latest analysis for Avangrid

查看我们对 Avangrid 的最新分析

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多兹维尔的超级投资者 沃伦·巴菲特描述了股价如何并不总是合理地反映企业的价值。通过比较每股收益(EPS)和一段时间内的股价变化,我们可以了解投资者对公司的态度是如何随着时间的推移而变化的。

During the three years that the share price fell, Avangrid's earnings per share (EPS) dropped by 11% each year. The share price decline of 14% is actually steeper than the EPS slippage. So it's likely that the EPS decline has disappointed the market, leaving investors hesitant to buy.

在股价下跌的三年中,Avangrid的每股收益(EPS)每年下降11%。14%的股价跌幅实际上比每股收益的下滑幅度更大。因此,每股收益的下降很可能令市场失望,使投资者对买入犹豫不决。

The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下图描述了 EPS 随着时间的推移是如何变化的(点击图片可以看到确切的值)。

earnings-per-share-growth
NYSE:AGR Earnings Per Share Growth November 6th 2023
纽约证券交易所:AGR 每股收益增长 2023 年 11 月 6 日

We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on Avangrid's earnings, revenue and cash flow.

我们很高兴地向大家报告,首席执行官的薪酬比资本状况相似的公司的大多数首席执行官更适中。始终值得关注首席执行官的薪酬,但更重要的问题是公司多年来是否会增加收益。可能值得一看我们关于Avangrid收益、收入和现金流的免费报告。

What About Dividends?

分红呢?

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. As it happens, Avangrid's TSR for the last 3 years was -29%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

重要的是要考虑任何给定股票的股东总回报率以及股价回报。股东总回报率是一种回报计算方法,它考虑了现金分红的价值(假设收到的任何股息已被再投资)以及任何贴现资本筹集和分拆的计算价值。可以说,股东总回报率可以更全面地描述股票产生的回报。碰巧的是,Avangrid在过去3年的股东总回报率为-29%,超过了前面提到的股价回报率。因此,该公司支付的股息促进了 股东回报。

A Different Perspective

不同的视角

Avangrid shareholders are down 15% for the year (even including dividends), but the market itself is up 16%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 4% over the last half decade. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Avangrid (of which 2 make us uncomfortable!) you should know about.

Avangrid的股东今年下跌了15%(甚至包括股息),但市场本身却上涨了16%。即使是优质股票的股价有时也会下跌,但我们希望看到企业的基本指标有所改善,然后才会变得过于感兴趣。不幸的是,去年的表现可能表明挑战尚未得到解决,因为这比过去五年来4%的年化亏损还要严重。我们意识到,罗斯柴尔德男爵曾说过,投资者应该 “在街头流血时买入”,但我们警告说,投资者应首先确保购买的是高质量的企业。我发现从长远来看,将股价视为业务表现的代表非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。比如说,比如风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了 Avangrid 的 3 个警告信号(其中 2 个让我们感到不舒服!)你应该知道。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings.

当然,通过寻找其他地方,你可能会找到一笔不错的投资。因此,请看一下我们预计收益将增加的这份免费公司名单。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发