share_log

COSCO SHIPPING Development (HKG:2866) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet

Simply Wall St ·  Oct 26, 2022 19:55

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that COSCO SHIPPING Development Co., Ltd. (HKG:2866) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

Check out our latest analysis for COSCO SHIPPING Development

How Much Debt Does COSCO SHIPPING Development Carry?

As you can see below, at the end of June 2022, COSCO SHIPPING Development had CN¥90.7b of debt, up from CN¥86.4b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it also had CN¥14.4b in cash, and so its net debt is CN¥76.3b.

debt-equity-history-analysisSEHK:2866 Debt to Equity History October 26th 2022

A Look At COSCO SHIPPING Development's Liabilities

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that COSCO SHIPPING Development had liabilities of CN¥56.1b falling due within a year, and liabilities of CN¥47.8b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of CN¥14.4b and CN¥7.82b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling CN¥81.7b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

The deficiency here weighs heavily on the CN¥28.4b company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, COSCO SHIPPING Development would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

As it happens COSCO SHIPPING Development has a fairly concerning net debt to EBITDA ratio of 7.6 but very strong interest coverage of 20.3. This means that unless the company has access to very cheap debt, that interest expense will likely grow in the future. Also relevant is that COSCO SHIPPING Development has grown its EBIT by a very respectable 26% in the last year, thus enhancing its ability to pay down debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is COSCO SHIPPING Development's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, COSCO SHIPPING Development saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.

Our View

To be frank both COSCO SHIPPING Development's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But on the bright side, its interest cover is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. We're quite clear that we consider COSCO SHIPPING Development to be really rather risky, as a result of its balance sheet health. So we're almost as wary of this stock as a hungry kitten is about falling into its owner's fish pond: once bitten, twice shy, as they say. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for COSCO SHIPPING Development (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement of any specific investment or investment strategy. Read more
    Write a comment