share_log

Does Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group (SHSE:600874) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

Simply Wall St ·  Sep 16, 2022 01:15

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group Company Limited (SHSE:600874) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group

What Is Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group's Net Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2022 Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group had debt of CN¥9.06b, up from CN¥8.25b in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of CN¥2.08b, its net debt is less, at about CN¥6.98b.

debt-equity-history-analysisSHSE:600874 Debt to Equity History September 16th 2022

A Look At Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group's Liabilities

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group had liabilities of CN¥3.38b falling due within a year, and liabilities of CN¥9.76b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had CN¥2.08b in cash and CN¥3.01b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total CN¥8.05b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of CN¥8.17b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group's use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 4.2, which signals significant debt, but is still pretty reasonable for most types of business. But its EBIT was about 11.1 times its interest expense, implying the company isn't really paying a high cost to maintain that level of debt. Even were the low cost to prove unsustainable, that is a good sign. We saw Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group grow its EBIT by 6.5% in the last twelve months. That's far from incredible but it is a good thing, when it comes to paying off debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

Our View

We'd go so far as to say Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was disappointing. But on the bright side, its interest cover is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. Overall, we think it's fair to say that Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group has enough debt that there are some real risks around the balance sheet. If all goes well, that should boost returns, but on the flip side, the risk of permanent capital loss is elevated by the debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection Group (1 is significant) you should be aware of.

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement of any specific investment or investment strategy. Read more
    Write a comment