share_log

ZTE (SZSE:000063) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

Simply Wall St ·  Sep 14, 2022 02:35

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We note that ZTE Corporation (SZSE:000063) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

When Is Debt A Problem?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

Check out our latest analysis for ZTE

What Is ZTE's Net Debt?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that ZTE had CN¥44.8b in debt in June 2022; about the same as the year before. However, it does have CN¥55.8b in cash offsetting this, leading to net cash of CN¥11.0b.

debt-equity-history-analysisSZSE:000063 Debt to Equity History September 14th 2022

A Look At ZTE's Liabilities

According to the last reported balance sheet, ZTE had liabilities of CN¥84.7b due within 12 months, and liabilities of CN¥38.4b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had CN¥55.8b in cash and CN¥33.1b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total CN¥34.1b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

ZTE has a very large market capitalization of CN¥111.2b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk. Despite its noteworthy liabilities, ZTE boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!

ZTE's EBIT was pretty flat over the last year, but that shouldn't be an issue given the it doesn't have a lot of debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if ZTE can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. While ZTE has net cash on its balance sheet, it's still worth taking a look at its ability to convert earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, to help us understand how quickly it is building (or eroding) that cash balance. Over the last three years, ZTE actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.

Summing Up

Although ZTE's balance sheet isn't particularly strong, due to the total liabilities, it is clearly positive to see that it has net cash of CN¥11.0b. The cherry on top was that in converted 113% of that EBIT to free cash flow, bringing in CN¥7.2b. So we don't think ZTE's use of debt is risky. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for ZTE that you should be aware of.

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement of any specific investment or investment strategy. Read more
    Write a comment