Mcsnacks H Tupack :
You have to remember these positions have interest rates on them. When interest rates outweigh the risk they are accepting it’s better to cover because they can get stuck with high interest rates and heavy losses if they cover combined. Especially if their leverage is running low because they lose that then they lose all their positions in the market.
Mike Huntスレ主Mcsnacks H Tupack:
Perhaps retail shorts covering is adequate surplus demand to move stock price? But I don’t see institutional shorts being forced to buy to cover on the 1-3 days the price spikes
Mcsnacks H TupackMike Huntスレ主:
These positions are all tied together for them. If they have a lot of short positions and the market increases it will put stress on what leverage they have. And they have to maintain their leverage if not the whole company can be bankrupted in a single day. One crack and it could be their downfall.
Mcsnacks H TupackMcsnacks H Tupack:
Plus they hedge stocks that have options. So they can work it up and down. Sometimes them covering helps if they have call options.
ChompAtTheBitcoinスレ主 :
1st I'd like to say....I'm sorry I have not even a tiny bit of a piece of a half of the smallest little iota of an idea to even guess what "now ntrb" means & I emphasize the "ntrb" part but really all of it is a mystery to me. It's like DaVinci's Code to me. Better yet, It's probably more like me being able to break down & make any sense of The Devil's Codex before figuring that out. Anyways, its like my cousins 4th or 5th step-dad used to say,usually without notice, he'd say "Why milk the cow when you can pork for free?"
ニュートリバンドに関するコメント
NEWS
Nutriband Inc. Announces $8.4M Private Placement
So I posted this question on another users post about short squeezes relating to these tickers.. Instead of answering it, the person deleted it. It was disappointing because I respect the poster and have nothing against him. In fact, I respect his knowledge which is why I asked him the ques...
まだコメントはありません