share_log

There Are Some Reasons To Suggest That Pyxis Tankers' (NASDAQ:PXS) Earnings Are A Poor Reflection Of Profitability

There Are Some Reasons To Suggest That Pyxis Tankers' (NASDAQ:PXS) Earnings Are A Poor Reflection Of Profitability

有一些理由表明,Pyxis Tankers(纳斯达克股票代码:PXS)的收益并不能很好地反映盈利能力
Simply Wall St ·  03/21 06:34

Pyxis Tankers Inc. (NASDAQ:PXS) posted some decent earnings, but shareholders didn't react strongly. We think that they might be concerned about some underlying details that our analysis found.

Pyxis Tankers Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:PXS)公布了一些不错的收益,但股东们的反应并不强烈。我们认为,他们可能会担心我们的分析发现的一些潜在细节。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NasdaqCM:PXS Earnings and Revenue History March 21st 2024
NasdaqCM: PXS 的收益和收入历史记录 2024 年 3 月 21 日

Zooming In On Pyxis Tankers' Earnings

放大 Pyxis Tankers 的收益

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

在高级财务中,用于衡量公司将报告的利润转换为自由现金流(FCF)的关键比率是应计比率(来自现金流)。应计比率从给定时期的利润中减去FCF,然后将结果除以该时间内公司的平均运营资产。这个比率告诉我们,一家公司的利润中有多少没有自由现金流的支持。

Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth.

因此,当公司的应计比率为负时,这实际上被认为是一件好事,但是如果应计比率为正,则被认为是一件坏事。这并不意味着我们应该担心应计比率为正,但值得注意的是,应计比率相当高的地方。那是因为一些学术研究表明,高应计比率往往会导致利润下降或利润增长放缓。

Over the twelve months to December 2023, Pyxis Tankers recorded an accrual ratio of 0.40. Statistically speaking, that's a real negative for future earnings. To wit, the company did not generate one whit of free cashflow in that time. Over the last year it actually had negative free cash flow of US$11m, in contrast to the aforementioned profit of US$36.2m. It's worth noting that Pyxis Tankers generated positive FCF of US$4.7m a year ago, so at least they've done it in the past. Having said that, there is more to the story. The accrual ratio is reflecting the impact of unusual items on statutory profit, at least in part.

在截至2023年12月的十二个月中,Pyxis Tankers的应计比率为0.40。从统计学上讲,这对未来的收益来说确实是负面的。换句话说,该公司在那段时间内没有产生一点自由现金流。在过去的一年里,它实际上有 负面的 自由现金流为1100万美元,而上述利润为3620万美元。值得注意的是,Pyxis Tankers一年前创造了470万美元的正FCF,因此至少他们过去曾这样做过。话虽如此,故事还有更多。应计比率至少部分反映了不寻常项目对法定利润的影响。

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Pyxis Tankers.

注意:我们始终建议投资者检查资产负债表的实力。点击此处查看我们对Pyxis Tankers的资产负债表分析。

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

不寻常物品对利润的影响

Given the accrual ratio, it's not overly surprising that Pyxis Tankers' profit was boosted by unusual items worth US$25m in the last twelve months. While we like to see profit increases, we tend to be a little more cautious when unusual items have made a big contribution. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. Which is hardly surprising, given the name. Pyxis Tankers had a rather significant contribution from unusual items relative to its profit to December 2023. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items are making its statutory profit significantly stronger than it would otherwise be.

考虑到应计比率,在过去十二个月中,价值2500万美元的不寻常物品提振了Pyxis Tankers的利润也就不足为奇了。虽然我们希望看到利润增加,但当不寻常的物品做出重大贡献时,我们往往会更加谨慎一些。当我们分析全球绝大多数上市公司时,我们发现重大不寻常的事项往往不会重演。考虑到这个名字,这并不奇怪。相对于其截至2023年12月的利润,Pyxis Tankers的特殊物品做出了相当大的贡献。因此,我们可以推测,这些不寻常的物品使其法定利润明显高于原来的水平。

Our Take On Pyxis Tankers' Profit Performance

我们对Pyxis油轮盈利表现的看法

Pyxis Tankers had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. For all the reasons mentioned above, we think that, at a glance, Pyxis Tankers' statutory profits could be considered to be low quality, because they are likely to give investors an overly positive impression of the company. With this in mind, we wouldn't consider investing in a stock unless we had a thorough understanding of the risks. For example, we've found that Pyxis Tankers has 2 warning signs (1 is potentially serious!) that deserve your attention before going any further with your analysis.

Pyxis Tankers的应计比率较低,但其利润确实得到了不寻常物品的提振。出于上述所有原因,我们认为,乍一看,Pyxis Tankers的法定利润可以被认为是低质量的,因为它们可能会给投资者带来对公司的过于积极的印象。考虑到这一点,除非我们对风险有透彻的了解,否则我们不会考虑投资股票。例如,我们发现 Pyxis Tankers 有 2 个警告信号(1 个可能很严重!)在进行进一步分析之前,这值得你注意。

In this article we've looked at a number of factors that can impair the utility of profit numbers, and we've come away cautious. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

在本文中,我们研究了许多可能削弱利润数字效用的因素,我们对此持谨慎态度。但是,还有很多其他方法可以告知你对公司的看法。有些人认为高股本回报率是高质量业务的好兆头。尽管可能需要代表你进行一些研究,但你可能会发现这份免费收集的拥有高股本回报率的公司,或者这份内部人士正在购买的股票清单很有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发