share_log

Do Institutions Own Jiangsu Huahong Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002645) Shares?

Do Institutions Own Jiangsu Huahong Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002645) Shares?

機構是否持有江蘇華虹科技股份有限公司(深交所:002645)股份?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/04/16 22:16

Every investor in Jiangsu Huahong Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002645) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

江蘇華虹科技股份有限公司(深交所代碼:002645)的每一位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東羣體。一般來説,隨着公司的成長,機構會增加他們的持股。相反,隨着時間的推移,內部人士往往會減少他們的持股。我非常希望看到至少有一點內部人持股。正如查理·芒格所説,給我看激勵措施,我就會告訴你結果。

Jiangsu Huahong Technology has a market capitalization of CN¥11b, so we would expect some institutional investors to have noticed the stock. In the chart below, we can see that institutions don't own many shares in the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Jiangsu Huahong Technology.

江蘇華虹科技的市值為110億元人民幣,因此我們預計一些機構投資者已經注意到了這隻股票。在下面的圖表中,我們可以看到,機構在該公司擁有的股份並不多。我們可以放大不同的所有權集團,瞭解更多關於江蘇華虹科技的信息。

View our latest analysis for Jiangsu Huahong Technology

查看我們對江蘇華虹科技的最新分析

SZSE:002645 Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2022
深交所:002645所有權明細2022年4月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jiangsu Huahong Technology?

關於江蘇華虹科技,機構持股告訴了我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構以一個接近當地市場的指數來衡量它們的表現。因此,他們通常更關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

Institutions have a very small stake in Jiangsu Huahong Technology. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.

這些機構在江蘇華虹科技的持股比例非常低。這表明該公司受到了一些基金的關注,但目前並不是特別受專業投資者的歡迎。如果業務從現在開始變得更強勁,我們可能會看到更多機構熱衷於購買的情況。當多家機構投資者想要購買股票時,我們經常會看到股價上漲。過去的收入軌跡(如下所示)可以預示未來的增長,但這並不能保證。

SZSE:002645 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2022
深圳證交所:002645收益和收入增長2022年4月17日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Jiangsu Huahong Technology. Our data shows that Jiangsu Huahong Industrial Group Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 35% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

對衝基金在江蘇華虹科技的股份並不多。我們的數據顯示,江蘇華虹實業集團股份有限公司是第一大股東,持有35%的流通股。作為參考,第二大股東持有約6.9%的流通股,第三大股東持有5.0%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

為了讓我們的研究更有趣,我們發現,前5名股東控制着公司一半以上的股份,這意味着這一羣體對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然有一些分析師的報道,但該公司可能沒有得到廣泛的報道。因此,它可以獲得更多的關注,在賽道上。

Insider Ownership Of Jiangsu Huahong Technology

江蘇華虹科技的內部人所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌着領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Jiangsu Huahong Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥2.1b worth of shares in the CN¥11b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎持有江蘇華虹科技有限公司相當大的股份。內部人士在這家價值110億元的公司中持有21億元的股份。這是很有意義的。大多數人會説,這表明與股東的關係很好,特別是在這樣一家規模如此大的公司。你可以點擊這裏,看看這些內部人士是一直在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 36% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司36%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 40%, of the Jiangsu Huahong Technology stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

看起來,民營企業持有江蘇華虹科技40%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有一傢俬人公司來對上市公司感興趣,而不是以個人身份。雖然很難得出任何大致的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個值得進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Jiangsu Huahong Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Jiangsu Huahong Technology has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

擁有一家公司股票的不同集團總是值得考慮的。但要更好地瞭解江蘇華虹科技,還需要考慮很多其他因素。以風險為例-江蘇華虹科技有一個警示信號,我們認為你應該意識到。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你更願意瞭解分析師對未來增長的預測,不要錯過這一點免費關於分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
這篇由《華爾街日報》撰寫的文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡單地説,華爾街在提到的任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論