Insiders Were the Biggest Winners as Kuangda Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002516) Market Cap Grew by CN¥569m Last Week
Insiders Were the Biggest Winners as Kuangda Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002516) Market Cap Grew by CN¥569m Last Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Kuangda Technology Group's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- 50% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Jieliang Shen)
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 內部人士似乎對曠達科技的增長有既得利益,因其持有大量股份
- 50%的公司股份由單一股東(沈傑良)持有
- 結合公司的歷史表現數據與股權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。
This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality.
這項科技可能會取代電腦:探索20只股票正在努力使量子計算成爲現實。
A look at the shareholders of Kuangda Technology Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002516) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
觀察曠達科技集團有限公司(SZSE:002516)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權勢。 持有公司最多股份的群體,準確地說,大約52%,是個別內部人士。 換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥569m last week.
顯然,在公司市值上週上漲了56900萬人民幣後,內部人士獲得了最大的好處。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Kuangda Technology Group.
在下圖中,我們聚焦於曠達科技集團的不同 ownership 群體。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kuangda Technology Group?
機構持股告訴我們關於曠達科技集團什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮買入包含在相關基準指數中的大公司。
Institutions have a very small stake in Kuangda Technology Group. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.
機構在曠達科技的持股非常少。這表明該公司正在受到一些基金的關注,但目前在專業投資者中並不特別受歡迎。如果業務在這裏變得更強,我們可能會看到更多機構熱衷於買入。當多個機構投資者想要買入股票時,我們通常會看到股價上漲。過去的營業收入軌跡(見下圖)可以作爲未來增長的指示,但沒有任何保證。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Kuangda Technology Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Jieliang Shen with 50% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Changzhou Industry Investment Group Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 1.6% of common stock, and Kuangda Technology Group Co., Ltd., ESOP holds about 0.8% of the company stock.
對沖基金在曠達科技的持股份額不多。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是沈傑良,持有50%的流通股。這意味着他們對公司的未來擁有控制權。常州產業投資集團有限公司是第二大股東,擁有1.6%的普通股,而曠達科技有限公司的員工持股計劃大約持有該公司0.8%的股票。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒也很重要,以了解潮流的方向。據我們所知,似乎沒有分析師覆蓋該公司,因此它可能在雷達下飛行。
Insider Ownership Of Kuangda Technology Group
曠達科技的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都會認爲董事會成員是內部人。管理層最終要對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不少見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內幕持股是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的利益高度一致。然而,在某些情況下,該集團的權力可能過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Kuangda Technology Group Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. That means they own CN¥3.5b worth of shares in the CN¥6.8b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我們最新的歷史數據表明,內幕人士擁有曠達科技集團有限公司大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決定。這意味着他們在這家市值68億人民幣的公司中擁有價值35億人民幣的股份。這非常重要。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們共同投資。您可能想要(免費)發現他們是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股比例
With a 42% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Kuangda Technology Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆擁有42%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,這在一定程度上影響着曠達科技集團。雖然這個群體不一定能主導決策,但確實能夠對公司的運行產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Kuangda Technology Group (1 is significant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。 例如,我們發現了曠達科技的2個警告信號(1個是重要的!)在您投資之前需要注意。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最好的買入股票。所以看看這個有趣公司的免費清單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數據是基於最近十二個月的數據計算的,這指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月的時間段。這可能與全年年報數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋嗎?對內容有疑慮嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall ST撰寫,屬於一般性質。我們提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,僅使用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不意圖提供財務建議。它不構成對買入或賣出任何股票的推薦,也未考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在提供基於基本數據的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中沒有持倉。