We Think Ho Bee Land (SGX:H13) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
We Think Ho Bee Land (SGX:H13) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies Ho Bee Land Limited (SGX:H13) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
大衛·伊本說得很好:『波動性並不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本的永久性損失。』因此,考慮債務時,您可能會發現顯而易見,因爲過多的債務可能會讓公司陷入困境。與許多其他公司一樣,和美置地有限公司(新加坡交易所:H13)也利用債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務帶來了多少風險?
AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early.
人工智能即將改變醫療保健。這20只股票正在致力於從早期診斷到藥物發現的所有工作。最棒的是 - 它們的市值都在100億美元以下 - 仍然有時間提前入場。
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來什麼風險?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
一般來說,債務只有在公司無法輕易償還時才會成爲真正的問題,要麼通過籌集資本,要麼通過自身的現金流。資本主義的一個組成部分是『創造性毀滅』的過程,在這個過程中,失敗的企業會被他們的銀行無情地清算。然而,更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是,公司不得不以低價籌集新的股本,從而永久稀釋股東的權益。通過替代稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本以高回報率進行投資的企業的極好工具。考慮公司的債務水平時,第一步是考慮其現金和債務的關係。
What Is Ho Bee Land's Net Debt?
和美置地的淨債務是多少?
As you can see below, Ho Bee Land had S$2.62b of debt at December 2024, down from S$3.08b a year prior. On the flip side, it has S$183.1m in cash leading to net debt of about S$2.44b.
正如下文所示,和美置地在2024年12月的債務爲266億新元,比前一年的30.8億新元下降。另一方面,它有18310萬新元的現金,導致淨債務約爲24.4億新元。

A Look At Ho Bee Land's Liabilities
和美置地的負債情況分析
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Ho Bee Land had liabilities of S$365.7m falling due within a year, and liabilities of S$2.51b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of S$183.1m and S$60.7m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by S$2.63b.
從最近的資產負債表可以看到,和美置地有需在一年內到期的負債爲36570萬新元,而超過一年到期的負債爲25.1億新元。另一方面,它擁有18310萬新元的現金和6070萬新元的應收賬款,需在一年內到期。因此,其負債超過現金及(短期)應收賬款的總和26.3億新元。
This deficit casts a shadow over the S$1.12b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. At the end of the day, Ho Bee Land would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.
這個赤字猶如一座巨大陰影籠罩在11.2億新元的公司上,彷彿一個巨人俯視普通人。因此,我們無疑會密切關注其資產負債表。歸根結底,如果其債權人要求償還,和美置地可能需要進行一次大規模的資本重組。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我們通過關注公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比值,以及計算息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出的能力(利息保障)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮包含和不包含折舊與攤銷費用的盈利能力和債務。
Weak interest cover of 1.9 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 8.4 hit our confidence in Ho Bee Land like a one-two punch to the gut. This means we'd consider it to have a heavy debt load. More concerning, Ho Bee Land saw its EBIT drop by 6.5% in the last twelve months. If it keeps going like that paying off its debt will be like running on a treadmill -- a lot of effort for not much advancement. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Ho Bee Land's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
薄弱的利息覆蓋率爲1.9倍及令人不安的淨債務與EBITDA比率爲8.4,像重拳擊打我們的信心一樣,令人對和美置地產生擔憂。這意味着我們會認爲其負債沉重。更令人擔憂的是,和美置地在過去12個月中的EBIT下降了6.5%。如果繼續這樣下去,償還債務就像在跑步機上跑步——費力但沒有什麼進展。分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是我們關注的重點。但更重要的是未來的盈利能力,這將判斷和美置地今後能否保持健康的資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的看法,你可能會對這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告感興趣。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Ho Bee Land recorded free cash flow worth 72% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
但我們最後一個考慮因素也很重要,因爲公司不能用紙面利潤來償還債務;它需要真實的現金。因此,我們總是檢查EBIT中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在最近三年中,和美置地的自由現金流佔其EBIT的72%,這在正常範圍內,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅款。這一自由現金流使得公司在合適的時候能夠償還債務。
Our View
Our View
To be frank both Ho Bee Land's net debt to EBITDA and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But at least it's pretty decent at converting EBIT to free cash flow; that's encouraging. We're quite clear that we consider Ho Bee Land to be really rather risky, as a result of its balance sheet health. So we're almost as wary of this stock as a hungry kitten is about falling into its owner's fish pond: once bitten, twice shy, as they say. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 2 warning signs with Ho Bee Land , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
坦率地說,和美置地的淨債務對EBITDA的比率以及其管理所有負債的記錄讓我們對其債務水平感到不太安心。但至少它在將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流方面表現還不錯;這讓人感到鼓舞。我們很清楚,由於其資產負債表的健康狀況,我們認爲和美置地真的相當風險。因此,我們對這隻股票的警惕性幾乎和一隻飢餓的小貓對跌入主人魚塘的恐懼一樣:一朝被蛇咬,十年怕井繩,正如他們所說。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是開始的地方。然而,投資風險並不完全源於資產負債表,遠非如此。我們已經識別出和美置地的兩個警告信號,理解這些信號應該成爲你投資過程的一部分。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資那些可以在沒有債務負擔的情況下增長利潤的業務,那麼請查看這份擁有淨現金的增長業務的免費列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋嗎?對內容有疑慮嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall ST撰寫,屬於一般性質。我們提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,僅使用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不意圖提供財務建議。它不構成對買入或賣出任何股票的推薦,也未考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在提供基於基本數據的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中沒有持倉。