The Recent 7.1% Gain Must Have Brightened Senior Key Executive Cheng Qu's Week, Haichang Ocean Park Holdings Ltd.'s (HKG:2255) Most Bullish Insider
The Recent 7.1% Gain Must Have Brightened Senior Key Executive Cheng Qu's Week, Haichang Ocean Park Holdings Ltd.'s (HKG:2255) Most Bullish Insider
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Haichang Ocean Park Holdings implies vested interests in company growth
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 57% ownership
- Institutions own 28% of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings
- 海昌海洋公園控股公司存在重要內部人員控制,意味着他們對公司增長有着既得利益。
- 該公司由2位投資者持有57%的股權。
- 機構擁有海昌海洋公園控股的28%。
A look at the shareholders of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings Ltd. (HKG:2255) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 48% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看漲海昌海洋公園控股有限公司(HKG:2255)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。持有最大股份的是個人內部股東,擁有48%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果出現低迷,將損失最嚴重)。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 7.1% gain.
因此,內部人士是上週7.1%收益的最大受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了對海昌海洋公園控股的不同所有權群體的查看。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Haichang Ocean Park Holdings?
機構持股告訴我們關於海昌海洋公園控股的信息。
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Haichang Ocean Park Holdings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Haichang Ocean Park Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
海昌海洋公園控股已經有機構在股東名冊上。實際上,他們在公司擁有一部分可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。如果多家機構同時改變他們對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看海昌海洋公園控股的下面的收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Haichang Ocean Park Holdings. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Haichang Ocean Park Holdings' case, its Senior Key Executive, Cheng Qu, is the largest shareholder, holding 48% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.7% and 4.9% of the stock.
對於海昌海洋公園控股有限公司,對沖基金持有的股份不多。因爲行動勝於言辭,當內部持有人擁有公司的重要股份時,我們認爲這是一個好跡象。在海昌海洋公園控股有限公司的情況下,其高級主要執行官程曲是最大的股東,持有48%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.7%和4.9%的股份。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 57% stake.
股權登記簿的更詳細研究向我們表明,前兩大股東通過其擁有的57%股份在該公司擁有重大持股。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好禮。該股票受到的分析師覆蓋範圍很小,但不多。因此,它有更多的空間獲得更多的覆蓋範圍。
Insider Ownership Of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings
海昌海洋公園控股的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just HK$6.1b, and insiders have HK$2.9b worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
根據我們最新的數據顯示,內部持有者佔海昌海洋公園控股有限公司的比例相當合理。該公司的市值僅爲61億港元,內部持有者名下的股份價值達到29億港元。我們可以說這顯示了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部持有者可能是創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部持有者是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 24% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
包括散戶投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司24%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能必然掌控局面,但它肯定會對公司經營方式產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。