Returns On Capital At CLP Holdings (HKG:2) Have Hit The Brakes
Returns On Capital At CLP Holdings (HKG:2) Have Hit The Brakes
Finding a business that has the potential to grow substantially is not easy, but it is possible if we look at a few key financial metrics. Firstly, we'll want to see a proven return on capital employed (ROCE) that is increasing, and secondly, an expanding base of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Although, when we looked at CLP Holdings (HKG:2), it didn't seem to tick all of these boxes.
要發現一個有潛力增長的業務並不容易,但如果我們審視幾個重要的財務指標,也是有可能實現的。首先,我們希望看到資金運作回報率(ROCE)有所增長,並且資金運作基數也在擴大。如果你看到這種情況,通常意味着這是一家擁有出色商業模式和大量盈利再投資機會的公司。雖然當我們看 CLP Holdings (HKG:2) 時,並沒有符合所有這些標準。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
我們對 Enphase Energy 的資本僱用回報率的看法:正如我們上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的資本回報率沒有提高,但它正在重新投資於業務。投資者必須認爲未來會有更好的前景,因爲股票表現良好,使持股五年以上的股東獲得了 690% 的收益。最終,如果基本趨勢持續存在,我們不會對它成爲一隻多頭股持有期很久很有信心。
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on CLP Holdings is:
對於那些不知道的人,ROCE是一個衡量公司年度稅前利潤(其回報)與業務所用資本的比率的指標。對於CLP Holdings的計算公式是:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。
0.081 = HK$15b ÷ (HK$229b - HK$42b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2023).
0.081 = HK$150億 ÷ (HK$2290億 - HK$42b)(截至2023年12月的最近十二個月)。
Thus, CLP Holdings has an ROCE of 8.1%. In absolute terms, that's a low return, but it's much better than the Electric Utilities industry average of 3.4%.
因此,CLP Holdings的ROCE爲8.1%。就絕對數字而言,這是一個較低的回報率,但比公用股行業平均水平高出很多,其爲3.4%。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for CLP Holdings compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for CLP Holdings .
上面你可以看到CLP Holdings當前的ROCE與其過去回報的比較,但從過去只能得到有限的信息。如果你有興趣,你可以在我們的免費分析師報告中查看分析師的預測。
What Can We Tell From CLP Holdings' ROCE Trend?
從CLP控股的ROCE趨勢中我們能得出什麼結論?
There hasn't been much to report for CLP Holdings' returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. Businesses with these traits tend to be mature and steady operations because they're past the growth phase. So don't be surprised if CLP Holdings doesn't end up being a multi-bagger in a few years time. That probably explains why CLP Holdings has been paying out 60% of its earnings as dividends to shareholders. Most shareholders probably know this and own the stock for its dividend.
過去五年,CLP控股的回報和資本運作水平都保持穩定,這些特徵的業務往往是成熟和穩定的運營,因爲它們已經過了增長階段。因此,如果CLP控股未能在未來幾年成爲“幾倍賺錢的股票”,請不要感到驚訝。這也可能解釋了爲什麼CLP控股支付了其收益的60%作爲分紅給股東。大多數股東可能知道這一點,並持有該股票以獲得分紅。
The Bottom Line
還有一件事需要注意的是,我們已經確定了上海醫藥的2個警告信號,了解這些信號應該成爲你的投資過程的一部分。
In summary, CLP Holdings isn't compounding its earnings but is generating stable returns on the same amount of capital employed. And investors may be recognizing these trends since the stock has only returned a total of 2.3% to shareholders over the last five years. As a result, if you're hunting for a multi-bagger, we think you'd have more luck elsewhere.
總之,CLP控股沒有讓其收益複合,但在相同的資本運作量上卻產生了穩定的回報。由於過去5年內該股票僅爲股東帶來2.3%的總回報,因此投資者可能正在認識到這些趨勢。因此,如果你在尋找“幾倍賺錢的股票”,我們認爲你在其他地方會更有運氣。
On a separate note, we've found 3 warning signs for CLP Holdings you'll probably want to know about.
另外,我們發現了 CLP控股 的 3個警示信號,可能值得你了解。
For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.
Hao Tian International Construction Investment Group確實存在一些風險,我們已經發現了一條警示標誌,你可能會感興趣。對於那些喜歡投資於實力雄厚的公司的人,可以查看這個由財務狀況強大、股本回報率高的公司組成的免費列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。