share_log

The Recent HK$518m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd. (HKG:3798)

The Recent HK$518m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd. (HKG:3798)

最近5.18億港元的市值下降可能會讓投資國土互動科技有限公司的內部人士失望(HKG: 3798)
Simply Wall St ·  04/02 19:04

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Homeland Interactive Technology implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 對國土互動科技的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
  • 共有3名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有53%的所有權
  • 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會

If you want to know who really controls Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd. (HKG:3798), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 68% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着國土互動科技有限公司(HKG: 3798),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有68%所有權的個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 16%.

上週,由於該股下跌了16%,內部人士遭受了最大的跌幅。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Homeland Interactive Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究國土互動科技的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:3798 Ownership Breakdown April 2nd 2024
SEHK: 3798 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 2 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Homeland Interactive Technology?

關於國土互動技術,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活躍的小公司通常缺少機構投資者,但是沒有機構投資者的大公司並不常見。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Homeland Interactive Technology might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

沒有機構擁有公司股份的原因可能多種多樣。通常,小型的新上市公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理不可能在公司中建立有意義的地位。或者,該公司的某些方面可能使機構投資者望而卻步。Homeland Interactive Technology可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的業績,或者他們可能根本沒有仔細研究該業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:3798 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 2nd 2024
SEHK: 3798 2024 年 4 月 2 日收益和收入增長

Homeland Interactive Technology is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Chengze Wu, with ownership of 34%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.5% and 8.8% of the stock. Bo Su, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Investment Officer.

國土互動科技不歸對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是吳承澤,所有權爲34%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.5%和8.8%的股份。第二大股東蘇波也恰好擁有首席投資官的頭銜。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 53% stake.

對股東登記處的更詳細研究表明,三大股東通過其53%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Homeland Interactive Technology

國土互動科技的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own HK$1.9b worth of shares in the HK$2.8b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎擁有國土互動科技有限公司一半以上的股票。這賦予了他們很大的力量。這意味着他們擁有這家28億港元公司價值19億港元的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示出與股東的強烈一致性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司27%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司的政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 5.6%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司擁有5.6%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Homeland Interactive Technology , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經確定了國土互動科技的1個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,來看看這份有趣的公司的免費清單吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論