share_log

Shareholders in Eastman Chemical (NYSE:EMN) Are in the Red If They Invested Three Years Ago

Shareholders in Eastman Chemical (NYSE:EMN) Are in the Red If They Invested Three Years Ago

伊士曼化學(紐約證券交易所代碼:EMN)的股東如果在三年前進行投資,則處於虧損狀態
Simply Wall St ·  01/16 13:01

While it may not be enough for some shareholders, we think it is good to see the Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE:EMN) share price up 17% in a single quarter. But that doesn't help the fact that the three year return is less impressive. Truth be told the share price declined 17% in three years and that return, Dear Reader, falls short of what you could have got from passive investing with an index fund.

儘管這對某些股東來說可能還不夠,但我們認爲看到伊士曼化學公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:EMN)的股價在一個季度內上漲了17%是件好事。但這無助於三年回報率不那麼令人印象深刻的事實。說實話,股價在三年內下跌了17%,親愛的讀者,這一回報沒有達到指數基金被動投資所能獲得的回報。

It's worthwhile assessing if the company's economics have been moving in lockstep with these underwhelming shareholder returns, or if there is some disparity between the two. So let's do just that.

值得評估的是,該公司的經濟狀況是否與這些令人難以置信的股東回報步調一致,或者兩者之間是否存在一些差距。所以我們就這麼做吧。

See our latest analysis for Eastman Chemical

查看我們對伊士曼化學的最新分析

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多茲維爾的超級投資者 禾倫·巴菲特描述了股價如何並不總是合理地反映企業的價值。考慮市場對公司的看法發生了怎樣的變化的一種不完美但簡單的方法是將每股收益(EPS)的變化與股價走勢進行比較。

Although the share price is down over three years, Eastman Chemical actually managed to grow EPS by 12% per year in that time. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

儘管股價在三年內下跌,但在此期間,伊士曼化學實際上每年設法將每股收益增長12%。鑑於股價的反應,人們可能會懷疑每股收益並不能很好地指導該期間的業務表現(可能是由於一次性的虧損或收益)。或者,過去的增長預期可能不合理。

It's worth taking a look at other metrics, because the EPS growth doesn't seem to match with the falling share price.

值得一看其他指標,因爲每股收益的增長似乎與股價的下跌不符。

We note that, in three years, revenue has actually grown at a 5.5% annual rate, so that doesn't seem to be a reason to sell shares. This analysis is just perfunctory, but it might be worth researching Eastman Chemical more closely, as sometimes stocks fall unfairly. This could present an opportunity.

我們注意到,在三年內,收入實際上以5.5%的年增長率增長,因此這似乎不是出售股票的理由。這種分析只是敷衍了事,但可能值得更仔細地研究伊士曼化學,因爲有時股票會不公平地下跌。這可能帶來機會。

You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).

您可以在下面看到收入和收入如何隨着時間的推移而變化(點擊圖片了解確切的值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:EMN Earnings and Revenue Growth January 16th 2024
紐約證券交易所:EMN收益和收入增長 2024年1月16日

Eastman Chemical is well known by investors, and plenty of clever analysts have tried to predict the future profit levels. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think Eastman Chemical will earn in the future (free analyst consensus estimates)

伊士曼化學爲投資者所熟知,許多聰明的分析師都試圖預測未來的利潤水平。因此,看看分析師認爲伊士曼化學未來的收入很有意義(免費的分析師共識估計)

What About Dividends?

分紅呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. In the case of Eastman Chemical, it has a TSR of -8.7% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!

在考慮投資回報時,重要的是要考慮兩者之間的區別 股東總回報 (TSR) 和 股價回報。基於股息再投資的假設,股東總回報率納入了任何分拆或貼現資本籌集的價值以及任何股息。可以說,股東總回報率更全面地描述了股票產生的回報。就伊士曼化學而言,其在過去三年的股東回報率爲-8.7%。這超過了我們之前提到的其股價回報率。這在很大程度上是其股息支付的結果!

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

Investors in Eastman Chemical had a tough year, with a total loss of 1.1% (including dividends), against a market gain of about 20%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 5% per year over half a decade. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Eastman Chemical that you should be aware of before investing here.

伊士曼化工的投資者經歷了艱難的一年,總虧損爲1.1%(包括股息),而市場漲幅約爲20%。但是,請記住,即使是最好的股票有時也會在十二個月內表現不如市場。好的一面是,長期股東賺了錢,在過去的五年中,每年增長5%。最近的拋售可能是一個機會,因此可能值得查看基本面數據以尋找長期增長趨勢的跡象。我發現將長期股價視爲業務績效的代表非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了伊士曼化學的兩個警告信號,在投資之前,您應該注意這些信號。

If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.

如果你想看看另一家公司——一家財務狀況可能優異的公司——那麼千萬不要錯過這份已經證明自己可以增加收益的公司的免費名單。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論