share_log

The Recent HK$433m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Mabpharm Limited (HKG:2181)

The Recent HK$433m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Mabpharm Limited (HKG:2181)

最近的4.33亿港元市值下降可能会让投资Mabpharm Limited的内部人士失望(HKG: 2181)
Simply Wall St ·  2023/11/17 17:08

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant insider control over Mabpharm implies vested interests in company growth
  • 68% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 对Mabpharm的重大内部控制意味着公司增长具有既得利益
  • 68% 的业务由前两位股东持有
  • 所有权研究与过去的表现数据相结合,可以帮助人们更好地了解股票的机会

A look at the shareholders of Mabpharm Limited (HKG:2181) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看Mabpharm Limited(HKG: 2181)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。持有该公司最多股份的集团是个人内部人士,准确地说约为50%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最大(或损失最大)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 19%.

上周,内部人士遭受了最大的损失,该股下跌了19%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Mabpharm.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关Mabpharm的哪些信息。

See our latest analysis for Mabpharm

查看我们对Mabpharm的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2181 Ownership Breakdown November 17th 2023
香港交易所:2181 所有权明细 2023 年 11 月 17 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mabpharm?

关于Mabpharm,缺乏机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

机构投资者通常会避开规模太小、流动性太差或风险太大的公司,不符合他们的口味。但是,看到没有任何机构投资者的大型公司是不寻常的。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Mabpharm's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

机构为何不拥有股票有多种解释。最常见的是,相对于管理的基金,公司规模太小,因此该机构不愿仔细观察该公司。另一方面,专业投资者总是有可能避开一家公司,因为他们认为这不是赚钱的最佳去处。Mabpharm的收益和收入记录(下图)可能不会吸引机构投资者,或者他们可能根本没有仔细研究过该业务。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2181 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 17th 2023
香港交易所:2181 收益和收入增长 2023年11月17日

Mabpharm is not owned by hedge funds. Jianjun Guo is currently the largest shareholder, with 50% of shares outstanding. With 18% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, CDH Investment Management Company Limited and Fortune Healthy Investment Limited are the second and third largest shareholders.

Mabpharm不归对冲基金所有。郭建军目前是最大股东,持有50%的已发行股份。CDH投资管理有限公司和富健投资有限公司分别占已发行股份的18%和5.2%,是第二和第三大股东。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 68% stake.

对股东登记处的更详细研究表明,两位大股东通过其68%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。我们目前没有收到分析师对该股的任何报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Mabpharm

Mabpharm 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Mabpharm Limited. Insiders have a HK$896m stake in this HK$1.8b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有Mabpharm Limited的合理比例。业内人士在这项18亿港元的业务中持有8.96亿港元的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有大量股份。你可以点击这里查看他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in Mabpharm. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Mabpharm23%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不同步,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With an ownership of 23%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股权公司拥有23%的所有权,能够在制定以价值创造为重点的企业战略方面发挥作用。有时我们会看到私募股权长期存在,但总的来说,它们的投资期限较短,而且顾名思义,对上市公司的投资并不多。一段时间后,他们可能会考虑出售资金并将其重新部署到其他地方。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 4.0%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股票的4.0%。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过持有私人公司而非以个人身份持有上市公司的权益。尽管很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个有待进一步研究的领域。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Mabpharm better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Mabpharm has 3 warning signs (and 2 which are concerning) we think you should know about.

对于拥有公司股份的不同群体,总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解Mabpharm,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。以风险为例-Mabpharm 有 3 个警告信号(其中 2 个令人担忧),我们认为你应该知道。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更愿意去另一家公司看看,一家财务状况可能更好,那么千万不要错过这份由强劲财务数据支持的有趣公司的免费名单。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发