Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    7,970.80
    +74.90 (+0.95%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,701.70
    +73.50 (+0.96%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6655
    +0.0021 (+0.31%)
     
  • OIL

    77.18
    -0.73 (-0.94%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,347.70
    -18.80 (-0.79%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    101,618.74
    +603.48 (+0.60%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,424.55
    -4.02 (-0.28%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6132
    +0.0014 (+0.23%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0824
    -0.0020 (-0.19%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,867.29
    +310.08 (+2.68%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    18,536.65
    -2.01 (-0.01%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,275.38
    +44.33 (+0.54%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    38,686.32
    +574.84 (+1.51%)
     
  • DAX

    18,497.94
    +1.15 (+0.01%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,079.61
    -150.58 (-0.83%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,487.90
    +433.77 (+1.14%)
     

Ten Sixty Four Limited's (ASX:X64) top owners are individual investors with 51% stake, while25% is held by institutions

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Ten Sixty Four Limited (ASX:X64), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Meanwhile, institutions make up 25% of the company’s shareholders. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders.

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Ten Sixty Four.

See our latest analysis for Ten Sixty Four

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ten Sixty Four?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ten Sixty Four already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ten Sixty Four's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

It would appear that 10% of Ten Sixty Four shares are controlled by hedge funds. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that Ruffer LLP is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 7.1% of the stock.

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

Insider Ownership Of Ten Sixty Four

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Ten Sixty Four Limited. As individuals, the insiders collectively own AU$7.2m worth of the AU$147m company. This shows at least some alignment, but we usually like to see larger insider holdings. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 51% of Ten Sixty Four shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 8.9%, of the Ten Sixty Four stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ten Sixty Four better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Ten Sixty Four (of which 1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) you should know about.

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Join A Paid User Research Session
You’ll receive a US$30 Amazon Gift card for 1 hour of your time while helping us build better investing tools for the individual investors like yourself. Sign up here