102246756樓主 pcwSg: 他們是否提供了你被取消資格的原因？

102246756樓主 pcwSg: 難怪您的 ID 突然無理由消失，但我記得在任何地方看到了特定的條款和條件。我只發現了這個；如果我們達到每個獎品類別的最大限制，則表示如果我們達到每個獎品類別的最大限制，我們將無法在剩餘的所有賽季中贏得未來的獎品。
由於第一、第二、第三位都是獨一無二的，而且不會重複，因此在開始賽季中贏得任何獎品的任何人將無法在未來獲得任何獎品。但是，由於每個獎品類別 80 美元、50 美元、10 美元（忽略排名）的最大數量超過 1 個，根據他們的無意義規則，我們可以每個賽季以任何順序贏得 1 個，而且不超過最大獎類別限制，然後在最後賽季中繼續贏得前 3 名。從技術上講，這仍然是正確的，不是嗎？

102246756樓主 pcwSg: My concern are two fold:
1 - Their rules state event runtime is from USA Eastern Time 0930-1600hrs Mon-Fri which corresponds to 2130-0400hrs Singapore time, therefore the system should be based on Full intraday market trading hrs as per previous S1 & S2, not cut off anyhow suddenly at 0000hrs SGT without prior notice or warning. Are they going to compensate or makeup those deserving participants whose closing market values at 0400hrs SGT lets their portfolio jump placement within top 100 ? And how about those lucky fellas who clearly dont deserve it, get better prizes simply because organiser decides to play punk ?  Where is the fair play ? If there is no integrity in their words or conditions or terms anywhere, do u think they wouldnt pull the rug on our funds if there is market turbulence ? Since their rules mean nothing to them or us ? In fact some of us are suspecting the time was cutoff suddenly so that participants close to them can benefit from the prizes
2 - Same logic goes for S4, if they claim the rules start from 0000hrs SGT onwards, then damn well they can run a concurrent S4 without stopping S3 isnt it ? To say its China national holiday does not make sense, are they so broke or incapable that they do not have coders or set the event to run, start, stop automatically without human intervention ? C'mon, any Singapore poly or even secondary student  can easily code a Python program to do the same thing easily nowadays. If they tell u its due to holiday its simply pushing the problem to another day so that u will forget and not pursue the issue lah
Mainland companies all behave the same way, Different problems but same taichi tactics. All come from the same playbook. Limpeh pui

102246756樓主 pcwSg: 我的 S2 + S3 屏幕截圖如下：
S2 ー 8 月 31 日星期二-SGT 2130 小時至 9 月 01 日星期三 SGT 0400 小時-仍可進行紙張交易，投資組合會自動更新
'
S3 ー 9 月 01 星期三 0000-0400 小時-記得可以點擊「加入」，界面顯示了額外的 S3，同時在紙張交易下拉框中顯示 S2，但如果嘗試進行紙張交易完成，系統會提示「事件尚未開始」類似的內容
'
S3 ー 9 月 01 日星期三僅於 SGT 2130 小時開始，適用於活躍交易
至於 SGT 0000hrs 投資組合截止錯誤，這只是在本次 S3 > S4 期間第一次發生

102246756樓主 : In ur case, ur account would already have been "specially marked"; cannot add new orders, while mine still operates as usual as do the rest of all contestants.
'
The statement "end at 2359hrs" is already itself ambiguous, u can see the interpretation is messy:
'
A - Stop new orders at 0000hrs + score all portfolios,  marked to market at 0000hrs ? [ S3 only ]
'
B - Stop new orders at 0000hrs + score all portfolios,  marked to market at 0400hrs ? [ Never happened before ]
'
Do recall that previous scoring of S1 & S2 portfolios were based on 0400hrs results + execution of orders were also available until 0400hrs.
'
U can say it is in line with tnc for this S3 > S4 transition, but that also means that S1 & S2 participants are shortchanged because they, the organiser, Did NOT follow their own tnc running the competition ? Put it this way, if S1 & S2 were to be retroactively scored according to 2359hrs cutoff instead of 0400hrs cutoff AND resulting u, becoming 2nd place receiving 1888 instead of 8888 and they want to claw back the prize money, will u do it ? Few hundred participants in 2 seasons were affected unfairly because they were Not "in line" previously, thats why