暂无数据
暂无内容
暂无数据
暂无数据
暂无数据
根据这份为期20年的分析,本周科技股的波动对股票意味着什么
作者:杰米·奇索尔姆(Jamie Chisholm)美国交易日的关键信息周一早盘股票期货走势表明,华尔街将延续上周的强劲涨势。令人担忧的是,肯定是波涛汹涌的
MarketWatch6分钟前
Arista将从大型科技云资本支出的增加中受益:花旗
Seeking Alpha8分钟前
梅萨社区学院为其 Apple 技术课程系列增加了 Jamf 认证
Yahoo Finance8分钟前
快讯 | 截至2024年4月29日,WallStreetBets的十大热门股票(通过Swaggy Stocks)
Benzinga8分钟前
Meta 因涉嫌未能打击俄罗斯的虚假信息而面临欧盟调查:报告
据报道,欧盟委员会计划调查Meta Platforms Inc(纳斯达克股票代码:META)的Facebook和Instagram,原因是担心俄罗斯的虚假信息,并怀疑审核不力。RE
Benzinga14分钟前
周一的热门股票:Alphabet、Nvidia、辉瑞等
Baystreet.ca15分钟前
Aaron_Kelly : 75 bps...no thanks
Harper lee Aaron_Kelly: An ETF could charge just 0.05 and not be worth it - and another ETF could charge 1.95 and be a bargain. The fact that this one is 75bps has nothing to do with whether it's a good investment or not.
Johnny Thunders Harper lee: At this moment, we have no performance to measure whether the ETF is a good or a bad investment. All we know is that they will charge .75%, which is high relative to other ETF's. Without a track record and a higher than average expense ratio, maybe we just throw this in the "Too Hard" pile to revisit later? Once we see some performance, then maybe we can then say the ETF is a bargain and worth the fee or wow, it really sucks and holders are getting fleeced in the process.
Apollod Wed Johnny Thunders: "At this moment, we have no performance to measure whether the ETF is a good or a bad investment". Exactly! Which is why it is wrong to say that .75% is too high. We don't know whether it's high or not.
ajkZbCYC8Q : Fee on the high side, I feel.
A1EIIWLU1C : Funny, as I came here to add a comment about my annoyance with the word disruptive. "Innovative" used to do the trick, but apparently that isn't edgy enough.
oXrssHBsXw : Marketing-wise, this reminds me of the “Internet Tollkeeper Fund (GITAX)” I bought in ‘99. Fees were brutal.
Baby u : As GS shareholder I love it, 75 BPS ca-ching!, will not use it but there are plenty of managers and clients with plenty of cash who will.