Retail Investors Invested in Himax Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:HIMX) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's US$61m Market Cap Decline
Retail Investors Invested in Himax Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:HIMX) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's US$61m Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
关键见解
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Himax Technologies indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 48% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insider ownership in Himax Technologies is 29%
- 散户投资者对Himax Technologies的大量所有权表明,他们在管理和业务战略方面共同拥有更大的发言权
- 48% 的业务由前 25 名股东持有
- Himax Technologies的内部所有权为29%
Every investor in Himax Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:HIMX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 49% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
Himax Technologies, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:HIMX)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。而持有最大份额的群体是拥有49%所有权的散户投资者。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Following a 3.6% decrease in the stock price last week, retail investors suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 29% stock also took a hit.
继上周股价下跌3.6%之后,散户投资者遭受的损失最大,但拥有29%股票的内部人士也受到打击。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Himax Technologies.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关Himax Technologies的信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Himax Technologies?
关于Himax技术,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构根据接近当地市场的指数来衡量其表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Himax Technologies. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Himax Technologies' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如你所见,机构投资者持有Himax Technologies的相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Himax Technologies的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Himax Technologies. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Biing-Seng Wu (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 22% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.8% by the third-largest shareholder.
对冲基金在Himax Technologies的股票不多。根据我们的数据,我们推断出最大股东是吴秉生(他还拥有最高关键高管的头衔),已发行股份的22%。当内部人士拥有公司大量股份时,这通常被认为是一个好兆头,在这种情况下,我们很高兴看到公司内部人士扮演关键利益相关者的角色。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约6.5%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有3.8%的所有权。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
深入研究我们的所有权数据后发现,前25名股东共持有不到一半的股份,这表明在很大一部分小股东中,没有一个单一股东占多数。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为你的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种很好的做法。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此您可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of Himax Technologies
Himax 科技的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
尽管内部人员的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难要求董事会对决策负责。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Himax Technologies, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$509m stake in this US$1.7b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息表明,内部人士持有Himax Technologies, Inc.的大量股份。有趣的是,内部人士在这项17亿美元的业务中拥有5.09亿美元的大量股份。大多数人会说,这表明了与股东的良好一致性,尤其是在如此规模的公司中。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 49% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司49%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Himax Technologies better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Himax Technologies (of which 1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) you should know about.
拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解Himax技术,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。比如风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了 Himax Technologies 的 2 个警告信号(其中 1 个让我们有点不舒服!)你应该知道。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后日期的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。