Keymed Biosciences Inc. (HKG:2162) Surges 11%; Retail Investors Who Own 37% Shares Profited Along With Institutions
Keymed Biosciences Inc. (HKG:2162) Surges 11%; Retail Investors Who Own 37% Shares Profited Along With Institutions
Key Insights
主要见解
- Keymed Biosciences' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 9 shareholders own 51% of the company
- 30% of Keymed Biosciences is held by Institutions
- Keymed Biosciences的大量零售投资者所有权表明关键决策受到较大公众股东的影响
- 前9大股东拥有该公司51%的股份。
- Keymed Biosciences的30%股份由机构持有
A look at the shareholders of Keymed Biosciences Inc. (HKG:2162) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 37% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看一下Keymed Biosciences Inc. (HKG:2162)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最有影响力。以37%的股份,零售投资者拥有该公司中的最多股份。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
While retail investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 11% price gain, institutions also received a 30% cut.
尽管零售投资者是上周股价上涨11%后获益最多的群体,但机构也获得了30%的收入。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Keymed Biosciences.
在下面的图表中,我们将焦点放在Keymed Biosciences的不同持股群体上。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Keymed Biosciences?
机构持股告诉我们什么与Keymed Biosciences有关?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Keymed Biosciences. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Keymed Biosciences, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在Keymed Biosciences拥有相当大的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为有时机构也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人都会一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时尝试抛售某只股票,导致股价暴跌,这并不罕见。因此,值得检查Keymed Biosciences的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Keymed Biosciences. The company's largest shareholder is Moonshot Holdings Limited, with ownership of 28%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.0% and 4.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
对科肽生物科技股票,对冲基金持股不多。该公司最大的股东是Moonshot Holdings Limited,持有28%的股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股的5.0%和4.9%。
We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进行了进一步的挖掘,并发现前9大股东持有该公司股份的51%左右,这意味着除了大股东外,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Keymed Biosciences
科肽生物科技的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.
我们无法证实董事会成员是否个人持有股份。董事会成员没有至少持有一些股份是不寻常的,所以我们的数据可能有误。下一步是查看这篇有关股票买入和卖出的免费总结,以进一步了解该问题。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 37% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Keymed Biosciences. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
拥有37%股权的广大公众,主要由个人投资者组成,在Keymed Biosciences拥有一定程度的影响力。 尽管拥有的股权规模相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 28%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们可以看到,私有公司持有股份总数的 28%。从单独这个事实很难得出任何结论,因此了解拥有这些私有公司的人是值得的。有时,公司内部人员或其他相关方可能通过单独的私有公司持有上市公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Keymed Biosciences .
尽管考虑到拥有公司的不同群体是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。为此,您应该注意我们在Keymed Biosciences发现的1个警示信号。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。