Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 6 hours 1 minute
  • Straits Times Index

    3,332.28
    +8.90 (+0.27%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,119.96
    +65.86 (+0.17%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,461.71
    +231.51 (+1.27%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,231.05
    +47.98 (+0.59%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    68,489.85
    +567.54 (+0.84%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,433.44
    -22.43 (-1.54%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,235.48
    -31.47 (-0.60%)
     
  • Dow

    38,111.48
    -330.02 (-0.86%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,737.08
    -183.52 (-1.08%)
     
  • Gold

    2,365.20
    -1.30 (-0.05%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    77.54
    -0.37 (-0.47%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.5540
    -0.0700 (-1.51%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,605.83
    +1.57 (+0.10%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,062.83
    +28.69 (+0.41%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,382.00
    +10.25 (+0.16%)
     

With 73% ownership of the shares, Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) is heavily dominated by institutional owners

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Microsoft's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 44% ownership

  • Insiders have sold recently

If you want to know who really controls Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 73% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Microsoft.

Check out our latest analysis for Microsoft

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Microsoft?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Microsoft does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Microsoft, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Microsoft. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.0% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.3% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.0% of the company stock.

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Microsoft

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Microsoft Corporation in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$1.0b of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 27% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Microsoft. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Microsoft better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Microsoft has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.