Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,322.62
    +14.72 (+0.45%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,307.01
    -14.40 (-0.27%)
     
  • Dow

    39,671.04
    -201.95 (-0.51%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,801.54
    -31.08 (-0.18%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    69,632.70
    -328.03 (-0.47%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,498.51
    -4.15 (-0.28%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,372.08
    +1.75 (+0.02%)
     
  • Gold

    2,364.60
    -28.30 (-1.18%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    78.08
    +0.51 (+0.66%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4340
    +0.0200 (+0.45%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,103.22
    +486.12 (+1.26%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,868.71
    -326.89 (-1.70%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,629.18
    +7.09 (+0.44%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,222.38
    +36.34 (+0.51%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,659.99
    +52.77 (+0.80%)
     

Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) is a favorite amongst institutional investors who own 75%

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lockheed Martin's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership

  • Recent sales by insiders

A look at the shareholders of Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 75% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Lockheed Martin.

See our latest analysis for Lockheed Martin

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lockheed Martin?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

Lockheed Martin already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lockheed Martin's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lockheed Martin. State Street Global Advisors, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 15% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 9.2% of the stock.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Lockheed Martin

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Lockheed Martin Corporation in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$63m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Lockheed Martin. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Lockheed Martin that you should be aware of.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.