Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 36 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,309.47
    +20.05 (+0.61%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,920.26
    +534.53 (+1.39%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    19,376.53
    +302.82 (+1.59%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,415.71
    -30.09 (-0.36%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    66,258.23
    +4,184.80 (+6.74%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,378.53
    -15.51 (-1.11%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,308.15
    +61.47 (+1.17%)
     
  • Dow

    39,908.00
    +349.89 (+0.88%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,742.39
    +231.21 (+1.40%)
     
  • Gold

    2,393.10
    -1.80 (-0.08%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    78.89
    +0.26 (+0.33%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3560
    -0.0890 (-2.00%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,608.20
    +4.97 (+0.31%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,256.47
    +76.64 (+1.07%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,628.20
    +69.57 (+1.06%)
     

The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO) is largely controlled by institutional shareholders who own 62% of the company

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Coca-Cola's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 47% ownership

  • Recent sales by insiders

Every investor in The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 62% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Coca-Cola.

View our latest analysis for Coca-Cola

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Coca-Cola?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

We can see that Coca-Cola does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Coca-Cola, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Coca-Cola. The company's largest shareholder is Berkshire Hathaway Inc., with ownership of 9.3%. With 8.6% and 7.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Coca-Cola

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our information suggests that The Coca-Cola Company insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$1.8b worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Public Company Ownership

It appears to us that public companies own 9.3% of Coca-Cola. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Coca-Cola is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.