share_log

The Recent CN¥894m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002653)

The Recent CN¥894m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002653)

最近8.94亿元人民币的市值下降可能会让投资海思科制药集团有限公司(SZSE:002653)的内部人士感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  04/22 00:05

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant insider control over Haisco Pharmaceutical Group implies vested interests in company growth
  • 60% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 对海思科制药集团的重大内部控制意味着公司增长的既得利益
  • 60% 的业务由前两名股东持有
  • 所有权研究与过去的表现数据相结合,可以帮助人们更好地了解股票的机会

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002653), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 79% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了海思科制药集团有限公司(SZSE:002653),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。持有公司股份最多的集团是内部人士,准确地说约为79%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

And following last week's 3.0% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

继上周股价下跌3.0%之后,内部人士遭受的损失最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Haisco Pharmaceutical Group.

在下图中,我们放大了海思科制药集团的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:002653 Ownership Breakdown April 22nd 2024
SZSE: 002653 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Haisco Pharmaceutical Group?

关于海思科制药集团,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

Haisco Pharmaceutical Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Haisco Pharmaceutical Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

海思科制药集团已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看海思科制药集团过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:002653 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 22nd 2024
SZSE: 002653 2024年4月22日收益和收入增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Haisco Pharmaceutical Group. Our data shows that Jun Min Wang is the largest shareholder with 36% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 24% and 14% of the stock. Xiu Lian Fan, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对海思科制药集团进行有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,王军敏是最大股东,已发行股份的36%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约24%和14%的股份。第二大股东范秀莲也恰好拥有首席执行官的头衔。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 60% stake.

对股东登记处的更详细的研究表明,有两位大股东通过其60%的股份拥有该公司相当大的所有权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。

Insider Ownership Of Haisco Pharmaceutical Group

海思科制药集团的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥29b, that means insiders have a whopping CN¥23b worth of shares in their own names. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.

我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有海思科制药集团有限公司的大部分股份。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做出决定。鉴于其市值为290亿元人民币,这意味着内部人士以自己的名义拥有高达230亿元人民币的股票。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士是否在出售他们的任何股票。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Haisco Pharmaceutical Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有海思科制药集团13%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Haisco Pharmaceutical Group you should be aware of.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。一个很好的例子:我们发现了海思科制药集团的两个警告信号,你应该注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发