share_log

Yeahka Limited's (HKG:9923) Stock Price Dropped 9.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

Yeahka Limited's (HKG:9923) Stock Price Dropped 9.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

Yeahka Limited(HKG: 9923)股价上周下跌9.2%;私营公司不会高兴
Simply Wall St ·  04/08 19:21

Key Insights

关键见解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Yeahka indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 56% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 私营公司在Yeahka拥有大量所有权,这表明它们在管理和业务战略方面集体拥有更大的发言权
  • 共有3名投资者拥有该公司的多数股权,拥有56%的所有权
  • 分析师的预测以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有深刻的了解

If you want to know who really controls Yeahka Limited (HKG:9923), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 56% to be precise, is private companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制着Yeahka Limited(HKG: 9923),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。持有该公司股份最多的集团是私营公司,准确地说约为56%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 9.2%.

上周,私营公司遭受了最大的损失,股价下跌了9.2%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Yeahka.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Yeahka的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:9923 Ownership Breakdown April 8th 2024
SEHK: 9923 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 8 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Yeahka?

关于Yeahka,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Yeahka already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Yeahka's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Yeahka已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Yeahka的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:9923 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 8th 2024
SEHK: 9923 2024 年 4 月 8 日收益和收入增长

Yeahka is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Creative Brocade International Limited with 37% of shares outstanding. Yeah Talent Holding Limited is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Headline holds about 7.2% of the company stock.

Yeahka不归对冲基金所有。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是Creative Brocade International Limited,已发行股份的37%。Yeah Talent Holding Limited是第二大股东,拥有12%的普通股,Headline持有公司约7.2%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在进一步挖掘之后,我们发现前三名股东共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有影响公司决策的巨大权力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Yeahka

Yeahka 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Yeahka Limited in their own names. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It seems the board members have no more than HK$44m worth of shares in the HK$4.7b company. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的数据表明,内部人士以自己的名义拥有Yeahka Limited不到1%的股份。但是,他们可能会通过我们尚未采用的公司结构获得间接利益。看来董事会成员在这家47亿港元的公司中持有的股份不超过4400万港元。我们通常希望看到董事会投入更多资金。但是,可能值得检查这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司21%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With a stake of 7.2%, private equity firms could influence the Yeahka board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司持有7.2%的股份,可能会影响Yeahka董事会。有些人可能会喜欢这样,因为私募股权有时是追究管理层责任的激进分子。但是其他时候,私募股权在公司上市后正在售罄。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 56%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的56%。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

It appears to us that public companies own 7.0% of Yeahka. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

在我们看来,上市公司拥有Yeahka7.0%的股份。很难肯定地说,但这表明它们将商业利益交织在一起。这可能是一个战略利害关系,因此值得关注这个领域的所有权变动。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Yeahka has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。以风险为例-Yeahka 有 2 个警告信号,我们认为你应该注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发