share_log

The Recent US$196m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (NASDAQ:HOLO)

The Recent US$196m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (NASDAQ:HOLO)

最近市值下跌1.96亿美元可能使投资MicroCloud Hologram Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:HOLO)的内部人士感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/31 08:45

To get a sense of who is truly in control of MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (NASDAQ:HOLO), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 81% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

为了弄清楚谁真正控制了微云全息图像公司(纳斯达克:HOLO),了解该企业的所有权结构是很重要的。持有该公司股份最多的集团,准确地说约为81%,是个人内部人士。换句话说,该集团将从他们对公司的投资中获得最大(或损失最大)。

As market cap fell to US$439m last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

随着市值上周跌至4.39亿美元,内部人士将面临比该公司任何其他股东群体都要高的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about MicroCloud Hologram.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于微云全息图的什么。

View our latest analysis for MicroCloud Hologram

查看我们对微云全息图的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:HOLO Ownership Breakdown January 31st 2023
NasdaqCM:2023年1月31日全息所有权明细

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MicroCloud Hologram?

机构所有权的缺乏告诉了我们关于微云全息图的什么?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我们不倾向于看到机构投资者持有风险很高、交易清淡或规模很小的公司的股票。尽管我们有时确实会看到大公司没有登记在册的机构,但这种情况并不特别常见。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. MicroCloud Hologram might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

对于机构为何不持有股票,有多种解释。最常见的是,相对于管理下的资金,该公司规模太小,因此该机构不会费心密切关注该公司。或者,该公司可能有某些方面让机构投资者望而却步。微云全息图可能没有机构想要的那种过去的表现,或者他们只是没有仔细研究过这项业务。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:HOLO Earnings and Revenue Growth January 31st 2023
纳斯达克CM:Holo收益和收入增长2023年1月31日

MicroCloud Hologram is not owned by hedge funds. Wei Peng is currently the largest shareholder, with 16% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 13% and 10.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Guohui Kang, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

微云全息图不为对冲基金所有。魏鹏目前是第一大股东,持有16%的流通股。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有流通股的13%和10.0%。第三大股东康国辉也恰好拥有董事会成员的头衔。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 58% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我们的研究还揭示了这样一个事实,即公司约58%的股份由前5名股东控制,这表明这些所有者对业务具有重大影响。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。据我们所知,没有分析师对该公司的报道,所以它很可能在雷达下飞行。

Insider Ownership Of MicroCloud Hologram

微云全息图的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,经理人担任执行董事会成员并不少见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官的话。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这会让其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of MicroCloud Hologram Inc.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own US$357m worth of shares in the US$439m company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的信息表明,内部人士拥有MicroCloud Hologram Inc.一半以上的股份。这让他们有效地控制了公司。这意味着他们持有这家市值4.39亿美元的公司价值3.57亿美元的股票。这是很有意义的。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over MicroCloud Hologram. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

拥有18%的股份,普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对微云全息图有一定程度的影响力。虽然这群人不一定能发号施令,但它肯定能对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for MicroCloud Hologram (2 are concerning) that you should be aware of.

我发现看看到底是谁拥有一家公司是非常有趣的。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定微云全息图的3个警告信号(2)你应该知道的。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然了这可能不是最值得购买的股票。。因此,您可能希望看到我们的免费一组有趣的潜在客户,拥有有利的财务状况。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发