Moomoo AI 已提取核心信息
Bowyer Research has recommended that Apple shareholders vote in favor of Proposal No. 5, which calls for an investigation and subsequent report on Apple's app content curation standards and dispute management procedures. The proposal aims to address concerns over Apple's prioritization of interests in content removal requests, which some view as ideological rather than practical. Apple's Board of Directors opposes the proposal, claiming that the company already provides sufficient information on app curation and government takedown orders, and maintains active oversight of content moderation policies. However, Bowyer Research criticizes the Board's response as mischaracterizing the proposal and offering vague commitments in light of serious deplatforming policy concerns. The report cites instances of Apple's content removal, such as the deplatforming of Parler and Gab, and legal action against employees raising content moderation concerns, as evidence of the need for greater transparency. The Board's stance is seen as potentially damaging to Apple's trust with shareholders and its reputation, given the political implications of content moderation decisions.
Bowyer Research has recommended that Apple shareholders vote in favor of Proposal No. 5, which calls for an investigation and subsequent report on Apple's app content curation standards and dispute management procedures. The proposal aims to address concerns over Apple's prioritization of interests in content removal requests, which some view as ideological rather than practical. Apple's Board of Directors opposes the proposal, claiming that the company already provides sufficient information on app curation and government takedown orders, and maintains active oversight of content moderation policies. However, Bowyer Research criticizes the Board's response as mischaracterizing the proposal and offering vague commitments in light of serious deplatforming policy concerns. The report cites instances of Apple's content removal, such as the deplatforming of Parler and Gab, and legal action against employees raising content moderation concerns, as evidence of the need for greater transparency. The Board's stance is seen as potentially damaging to Apple's trust with shareholders and its reputation, given the political implications of content moderation decisions.
Bowyer Research建议苹果股东对第5号提案投赞成票，该提案要求对苹果的应用程序内容管理标准和争议管理程序进行调查并随后提出报告。该提案旨在解决人们对苹果在内容删除请求中优先考虑利益的担忧，有人认为这是意识形态而不是实际的。苹果董事会反对该提议，声称该公司已经提供了有关应用策划和政府下架令的足够信息，并对内容审核政策保持积极监督。但是，Bowyer Research批评董事会的回应错误地描述了该提案，并鉴于严重的平台化政策担忧，提供了模糊的承诺。该报告列举了苹果删除内容的例子，例如Parler and Gab的去平台化，以及对提出内容审核问题的员工提起法律诉讼，以此作为提高透明度的必要性的证据。鉴于内容审核决策的政治影响，董事会的立场被视为可能会损害苹果对股东的信任及其声誉。
Bowyer Research建议苹果股东对第5号提案投赞成票，该提案要求对苹果的应用程序内容管理标准和争议管理程序进行调查并随后提出报告。该提案旨在解决人们对苹果在内容删除请求中优先考虑利益的担忧，有人认为这是意识形态而不是实际的。苹果董事会反对该提议，声称该公司已经提供了有关应用策划和政府下架令的足够信息，并对内容审核政策保持积极监督。但是，Bowyer Research批评董事会的回应错误地描述了该提案，并鉴于严重的平台化政策担忧，提供了模糊的承诺。该报告列举了苹果删除内容的例子，例如Parler and Gab的去平台化，以及对提出内容审核问题的员工提起法律诉讼，以此作为提高透明度的必要性的证据。鉴于内容审核决策的政治影响，董事会的立场被视为可能会损害苹果对股东的信任及其声誉。
有用
没用