$AUMAS (0098.MY)$ I think is global issues, not this share only

$AUMAS (0098.MY)$ Does anyone know why it dropped?

$AUMAS (0098.MY)$ OTHERS PROPOSED NEW AUTHORITY TO AUMAS RESOURCES BERHAD ("AUMAS") TO PURCHASE ITS OWN ORDINARY SHARES OF UP TO TEN PERCENT (10%) IN THE ENTIRE ISSUED AND PAID-UP SHARE CAPITAL OF THE COMPANY AT ANY GIVEN POINT IN TIME ("PROPOSED NEW SHARE BUY-BACK AUTHORITY")
AUMAS RESOURCES BERHAD
Type Announcement
Subject OTHERS
Description PROPOSED NEW AUTHORITY TO AUMAS RESOURCES BERHAD ("AUMAS") TO PURCHASE ITS OWN ORDINARY SHARES OF UP TO TEN PERCENT (10%) IN THE ENTIRE ISSUED AND PAID-UP...

$AUMAS (0098.MY)$ ​TAWAU: The civil trial involving AuMas Resources Berhad (formerly Bahvest Resources Berhad) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Wullersdorf Resources Sdn. Bhd., continued today at the Tawau High Court before Judicial Commissioner Steve Ritikos.
​During the proceedings, the court issued several case management directions regarding several pending applications.
​The legal action names Lo Fui Ming, Lo Teck Yong, Chong Khing Xhung, and Southsea Gold Sdn. Bhd. as defendants.
Counsel...

$AUMAS (0098.MY)$ why drop

$AUMAS (0098.MY)$ This market maker beats and beats the stock into pulp. But what is the point ? Obviously, the guy is finished. KO. Let us take a break.

$AUMAS (0098.MY)$ So, what did the datuk do this time ? Punctured tires in the AuMas Trucks ? This stock never seems to be able to pick up the pieces ...

$AUMAS (0098.MY)$ TAWAU: The civil case trial involving the gold mining company, AuMas Resources Berhad (formerly Bahvest Resources Berhad) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Wullersdof Resources Sdn. Bhd., resumed today at the High Court here.
The proceedings took place before Judicial Commissioner Steve Ritikos, who issued several case management directions involving several undecided applications.
The lawsuit names Lo Fui Ming, Lo Teck Yong, Chong Khing Xh...

$AUMAS (0098.MY)$ Material Litigation (cont’d)
On 4 December 2023, the Sandakan High Court in Civil Suit No. SDK-22NCvC-11-6/2023 (Sandakan
Suit) has granted an inter partes injunction order against SGSB along the following terms:
a) that SGSB be restrained, either by itself or through its directors, associates, officers, servants, agents,
nominees or anyone else, from taking any further steps in respect of SGSB’s Demand dated 2 May
2023 and/or the purported Temporary Resolution between W...