The Rhino Brother incident caused the channel to lose followers.
$Intuit (INTU.US)$ The blogger has already stated that it does not constitute investment advice as a shield. Clearly, the blogger's ethics and investment skills are also problematic, leading to the blogger earning traffic fees while the followers lose their principal. Legal immunity does not equate to moral immunity.
This is now a movement of de-mythologizing. What needs to be done now is an awakening of awareness—watching YouTube for investment advice is unreliable, and no wealth is made by mere copying. The only thing to do is unsubscribe and block.
Recommending stock trades is also morally wrong unless the blogger shows a license; otherwise, it is trampling on morality. Moreover, the blogger’s insufficient knowledge, even reaching the peak of ignorance, yet desperately proving themselves to protect their image and self-esteem, followed by a bunch of excuses to cover up facts and shift blame, is unacceptable.
I hope the blogger reflects and learns. Followers are not being unreasonable; don’t talk about 'black fans,' nobody has time to be negative just for the sake of it. Instead, the appearance of whitewashing and internet trolls proves that the blogger’s knowledge can no longer support their persona.
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only.
Read more
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
韭黄炒鸡蛋 : Funny. People curse when it drops, but do they share the profits when it rises? There's no such thing as a 100% guaranteed investment.
70176582 : Blaming others for poor risk management is ridiculous, especially when someone only invested 4% while you heavily lost with a concentrated position. Haha, how amusing.
75714493 : Truly hilarious! Why not blame yourself for lacking ability? Cheating on the exam and getting it wrong, then blaming others for providing incorrect answers! Speechless! Utterly speechless!
Viking0605 : When you let a fund manage your investments, there is no guaranteed return, and they still charge you management fees. The contract will always state 'no guaranteed returns.' If you win, you profit; if you lose, you bear the loss — results are not assured. In the US, legitimate institutions almost never promise returns. Would you dare to invest with someone promising you a 100% profit? Rhino posts videos to help you for free, and now that you see an opportunity, you keep attacking endlessly. If a mutual fund caused you losses, would you dare act like this? Isn't it just because Rhino is fighting alone?