English
Back
Download
Need Help?
Log in to access Online Inquiry
Back to the Top
Microsoft’s AI Engine Roars: Profit Jumps 31%, Azure Tops $100B
Moo Live
joined discussion ·

Microsoft Q4 FY2026 earnings conference call

Key Takeaways (AI-Generated)
Financial Performance
- Annual revenue surpassed $331 billion, up 18%, with Microsoft Cloud at $214 billion, up 27%
- Azure revenue exceeded $100 billion, growing 41% against a strong prior-year comparable
- Q4 revenue reached $90 billion, up 18%, with operating income increasing 18%
- Capital expenditures totaled $41 billion with free cash flow of $19.6 billion
Business Highlights
- Added 31 new data centers across 5 continents, bringing total to 88 this year
- M365 Copilot reached over 30 million paid seats with net adds doubling quarter over quarter
- GitHub Copilot expanded to 50 million users with revenue accelerating over 60% quarter over quarter
- Increased throughput for Copilot workloads 4X since start of year with significant efficiency gains
Financial Guidance
- FY27 expects double-digit revenue and operating income growth with mid- to high-single-digit expense growth
- Q1 revenue expected between $89.85–$90.95 billion representing 16–17% growth
- Azure revenue growth expected at approximately 45% in constant currency for Q1
- Capital expenditures will grow year over year given strong demand signals across portfolio
Opportunities
- Market expansion through AI sovereignty offerings and global datacenter footprint across 5 continents
- Product innovation developing new model system with separate harness, context, memory and action space
- Operational efficiency achieving 89% reduction of GPU costs in Dynamics 365 and 84% in PowerPoint
- Strategic partnerships with Mistral for Sovereign Cloud and early deployment of next generation infrastructure
Risks
- Customer demand continues to exceed available capacity indicating ongoing supply constraints
- Higher component pricing impacting capital expenditures and device pricing across product lines
- Complex PC market dynamics affected by component prices and inventory levels impacting Windows OEM revenue
Full Transcript (AI-Generated)
Operator
In the company's fourth quarter performance, in addition to the impact these items and events have on the financial results, all growth comparisons we make on the call today relate to the corresponding period of last year, unless otherwise noted. We will also provide growth rates in constant currency when available as a framework for assessing how our underlying businesses performed, excluding the effect of foreign currency rate fluctuations. Where growth rates are the same in constant currency, we will refer to the growth rates only.
We will post our prepared remarks to our website immediately following the call until the complete transcript is available. Today's call is being webcast live and recorded. If you ask a question, it will be included in our live transmission in the transcript and in any future use of the recording. You can replay the call and view the transcript on the Microsoft Investor Relations website.
During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements which are predictions, projections or other statements about future events. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could materially differ because of factors discussed in today's earnings press release, in the comments made during this conference call and in the risk factor section of our Form 10K, Forms 10Q and other reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statement. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Satya.
Satya Nadella
Thank you very much, Jonathan. It was a very strong close to what was a record fiscal year for us. All up, our annual revenue surpassed $331 billion, up 18%. Microsoft Cloud surpassed $214 billion, up 27%, and Azure surpassed $100 billion, up 41%.
Going forward, we have two goals. First, ensuring AI empowers every person, amplifying their agency and ambition. And second, empowering every organization to build their own continuous learning loop and ensuring that they don't outsource their core IP.
Now let's talk about how we're delivering this across our stacks, starting with our AI platform and infrastructure. We added 31 new data centers across 5 continents this quarter, bringing the total to 88 this year. As we expand our footprint in response to accelerating demand, we're also bringing capacity online faster than ever. Over the last fiscal year, we have reduced datacenter lifetimes for new GPUs in our largest regions by nearly 50%.
All up, we added another gigawatt of capacity this quarter and remain on track to roughly double our overall capacity in just two years. We're also getting more from the infrastructure we already have by optimizing across silicon systems and software. For example, we increased the throughput for Copilot workloads 4X since the start of the year.
AI sovereignty is increasingly top of mind for our customers and we are expanding our offerings to meet that need. Just last week, we announced a partnership with Mistral to bring its models to Microsoft Sovereign Cloud, enabling customers to run them across public, customer controlled and fully disconnected environments.
We also continue to modernize our fleet with our own silicon innovation alongside the latest from NVIDIA and AMD. Maya 200 continues to scale. It delivers 30% better performance per dollar than the latest generation hardware in our fleet and is now supporting both OpenAI and Mai models. And we will be among the first cloud providers to deploy next generation rack scale AI infrastructure based on AMD Helios and NVIDIA Vera Rubin.
When it comes to running agents, CPUs are just as important as GPUs. Our Cobalt VMs are powering both our own first party workloads as well as workloads for customers, including Adobe, ARM, Elastic, OpenAI, Sprinkler and TomTom. And by the end of this month, we expect to have our Cobalt 200 racks in over 25 data centers around the world as we rapidly expand capacity.
Now let me turn to the end to end platform. We're building on this infrastructure to run, govern and distribute apps and agents. It starts with model choice. Every customer wants the right model for each task based on quality, latency, cost and compliance. We offer the broadest model catalog in the cloud with over 11,000 models, including the latest from OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, xAI as well as our own Mai family.
Since the start of the year, we have seen 5X increase in the number of customers building with models from multiple providers. Levi Strauss and Co for example, is using models from OpenAI and Anthropic on Foundry as it brings more than thousand domain specific agents into a unified enterprise AI platform.
We're also accelerating our own model development. We announced more than a dozen new models across image, voice, transcription, coding, security, including our first reasoning model Mai Thinking 1, all with cost efficient inference at the core for the enterprise use cases.
We are co-designing these models with our silicon and we are seeing 40% better performance per Watt when running Mai models on Maya 200. But more importantly, we are building a new model system where the harness context, memory and action space are separate from any one model family, thereby moving the frontier on the cost to outcome curve.
And it's not just about cost, it also has the added benefit of business continuity and resilience because every model is substitutable. This is the system we're using in our products with great results. For example, millions of developers have used Mai Code 1 Flash on GitHub Copilot, achieving higher code acceptance rates and 10% lower median token usage while still having access to frontier capabilities from OpenAI and Anthropic.
In Excel, Mai Code 1 Flash is delivering comparable quality to GPT-4o for the most common task while operating at significantly lower cost. In security, Mai Cyber One Flash achieves better performance than much larger models, but at half the cost when combined with our multi-agent security harness.
More broadly, across our model implementations, we are seeing significant efficiency gains including an 89% reduction of GPU costs in Dynamics 365 with Mai Voice 2 Flash and up to an 84% reduction in GPU costs in PowerPoint with Mai Image 2.5. And this system is available to any company to use as part of Foundry.
The next layer is the enterprise data and context. The data estate is evolving from primarily supporting apps used by people to supporting agents. Customers are rapidly adopting our AI-optimized databases like Cosmos DB and PostgreSQL to give agents fast, secure access to the real-time data and context they need for memory and retrieval.
PostgreSQL revenue was up 55%, accelerating for the third consecutive quarter. Additionally, the number of PostgreSQL customers also using Foundry increased by 80% as customers increasingly choose it as the database for AI workloads. And we are going further with Horizon DB, our new fully managed PostgreSQL service on Azure, which delivers three times the throughput of self-managed deployments.
When it comes to analytics, we now have over 40,000 paid Fabric customers, up more than 60% year over year, and over 17,000 customers now use both Foundry and Fabric, also up 60% year over year, as enterprises connect agents to real-time operational, analytical, and unstructured data in Fabric.
This quarter, we also introduced Rayfin, the agent-first SDK that delivers a backend-as-a-service for building apps and Fabric. More than 2,500 customers have already used Rayfin, and it is now powering the backends for apps created with Copilot Studio.
On top of this data estate, we are building an IQ layer that combines data with model capabilities to deliver the right context at the right time. Tens of thousands of customers, including nearly 90% of the Fortune 500, are already grounding their agents in enterprise context with Foundry, Fabric, and Work IQ. And this quarter we introduced Web IQ, which gives agents access to real-world intelligence from across the web. It is already being used by the most popular AI assistants, including ChatGPT.
Beyond model choice, data, and context, we are building Foundry as the complete app and agent stack. It gives agents access to the IQ layer, the tools they use, along with durable state and memory, secure sandboxes, rubrics and evaluations, and even their own self-improvement loops. We now have 100,000 Foundry customers, and revenue more than doubled year over year.
Telefonica, for example, adopted Foundry as the foundation of its corporate agentic platform, with its first wave of agents tackling mission-critical network operations. Overall, the number of Foundry customers running at a 1 trillion token annualized run rate increased fourfold year over year.
And finally, with Agent 365, we offer a control plane that extends companies’ existing governance, identity, security, and management frameworks to the agents they build. Just two months in, Agent 365 now has nearly 40 million agents registered across tens of thousands of companies.
Now let me turn to the apps and agents we are building on top of this platform for individuals and organizations when it comes to knowledge work. We now have over 30 million paid Microsoft 365 Copilot seats, with net seat additions more than doubling quarter over quarter.
Copilot is evolving rapidly from chat to co-work to autopilots. Last month, we made co-work generally available, helping customers complete multi-step tasks grounded in their work data while meeting enterprise security and compliance requirements. This quarter, we also introduced autopilots—autonomous, long-running agents with full enterprise compliance, including an always-on personal agent powered by OpenAI.
And this quarter, we are bringing these Copilot experiences together—including code—into one super app spanning both consumer and commercial experiences. This is a major step forward, and I look forward to sharing more soon.
More broadly, we have steadily been improving the quality and performance of Copilot and have been delighted by the recent customer feedback. Over the last three quarters, user satisfaction scores have doubled and are now at an all-time high, and this quarter alone we cut latency by 25%.
These quality improvements, together with continued product innovation, are driving record usage intensity. The number of conversations per user has nearly doubled year over year. Average weekly engagement is on par with Outlook and Teams. And the time from deployment to what we consider high usage—meaning monthly active usage of about 80% across a customer’s user base—has fallen from months to just days over the past year.
The number of customers with more than 50,000 seats increased over 7x year over year, and the number of enterprise customers deploying Copilot to the majority of their information workers grew nearly 75% quarter over quarter—a signal of how central Copilot has become to their operations.
NHS England, for example, is rolling out Copilot to 505,000 clinicians and staff—the largest healthcare deployment of its kind—after a trial showed it saved employees an average of 43 minutes per day. KPMG is expanding its deployment across its global workforce of more than 276,000 professionals, and HSBC committed to 200,000 seats to accelerate its workforce transformation.
AstraZeneca, Boeing, Infosys, Coca-Cola Inc., Procter & Gamble, Celanese, Tata Consultancy Services, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Wells Fargo, and Wipro each purchased 60,000 or more.
And we have been encouraged by the response to our new E7 suite as customers increasingly go all in on an integrated AI offering that brings together Copilot, E5, Entra, and Agent 365. Just two months after launch, hundreds of enterprise customers have already purchased millions of seats, and this quarter EY deployed E7 to 400,000 employees in our largest win to date.
In addition to this, we are also evolving our business model beyond per seat to per seat plus consumption, further expanding our TAM and delivering more customer value. Earlier this month we added usage based billing to co-work with thousands of customers already paying for and actively using it.
In biz apps, we have been reinventing Dynamics 365 for an agent first world. We are exposing over 650,000 MCP actions across sales, finance, supply chain, HR and customer service so that agents can now access business context and take action using the same data models, rules, permission, security guardrails and audit trails as any application user.
And we are also moving from seats to seats plus consumption model. Customer service is at the forefront of this transformation with usage based credit consumption in this category up 4X quarter over quarter with customers like Northern Trust using our tools to drive proactive intelligence.
When it comes to developers, GitHub Copilot now has 50 million users. This quarter we introduced usage based billing and have continued to see business and enterprise seat growth and also significant consumption revenue. After the new model went into effect, Copilot revenue accelerated over 60% quarter over quarter.
All up, GitHub now has 225 million users. As organizations across every industry, including over 90% of the Fortune 500, choose GitHub for their AI powered development, the agentic era is being built on GitHub. Every major coding agent runs on the platform and one in three pull requests on GitHub now involves an agent.
In security, we are helping customers both secure their AI deployments and use AI to strengthen their security posture. To date, Purview has audited over 15 billion copilot interactions to meet compliance obligations, up nearly 360% year over year. And earlier this week, we introduced Project Perception, a complete multimodal agentic security system that brings together teams of agents to simulate attacks, investigate threats and drive remediation.
As Perception moves beyond private preview, we expect to bring it to customers through a consumption based offering. In healthcare, we're on pace to automate over 100 million patient encounters this calendar year, including 28 million this quarter, up 2X year over year. Mass General Brigham rolled out Dragon Copilot to over 4000 providers and after a study found ambient AI reduced burnout by 21%.
And in science, Microsoft Discovery now broadly available, provides a comprehensive platform for building and governing agentic workflows for science and engineering. Early customers include BHP, GSK, Pacific Northwest National Lab.
Across both our high value agentic experiences and the AI platform and infrastructure, we are focused on helping customers turn AI into measurable outcomes. The most comprehensive and valuable data in the world is inside each of the customer tenants and therefore there is a tremendous opportunity to turn customers workflows, domain knowledge and accumulated judgment into AI systems that learn and improve with every usage.
To help customers capture that opportunity, this month we launched Microsoft Frontier Core, the largest outcome driven engineering organization in the industry. We will embed 6000 industry and engineering experts with customers to co-design, co-innovate and continuously improve AI systems at scale.
We've been testing this model over the past year, completing over 330 projects across 164 customers, including many of the world's leading companies across industries. For example, our teams worked with Novo Nordisk to build an agent that helps analyze clinical data while meeting its strict compliance requirements. And we partnered with LSEG to embed AI into LSEG Workspace, helping finance professionals ask complex questions and quickly find answers across structured and unstructured financial content.
Finally, let me talk about devices and consumer. When it comes to Xbox, we are making the necessary decisions required across our content portfolio, platform and operations to reset the business for long-term growth. We have the best IP in the industry and talented studios around the world and believe we can bring these trends together and expect to return the business to growth in fiscal 2027.
In Windows, we're investing to ensure that it has the best quality and fundamentals while also ensuring it's the best place to run secure Edge AI. We see significant opportunity for Windows to become the offload for unmetered intelligence, combining powerful on-device compute with enterprise-grade security.
In search and advertising, Bing and Edge have both taken share for five straight years and LinkedIn continues to see strong engagement across the platform with double-digit member growth for the 5th consecutive year. Recruiters at over 20,000 companies are now using our AI-powered solutions to reduce time to hire and improve candidate matching. Seats increased 140% quarter over quarter.
In closing, I'm energized by the opportunities ahead. I've never been more confident in Microsoft's opportunity to drive durable long-term growth and ensure the benefits of AI flow broadly. With that, let me turn it over to Amy to walk through our financial results and outlook.
Amy Hood
Thank you, Satya, and good afternoon everyone. This fiscal year we delivered over $331 billion in revenue with growth accelerating to 18%, driven by strong demand across both the Azure platform and our first-party AI applications and services. Operating income growth outpaced revenue growth, increasing 21% to more than $155 billion as we invested in long-term growth while continuing to expand operating leverage.
This quarter revenue was $90 billion, up 18% and 17% in constant currency. Gross margin dollars increased 15% and operating income increased 18%. Earnings per share was $4.74, an increase of 23% when adjusted for the impact from our investment in OpenAI, and FX was roughly in line with guidance.
Several discrete items impacted our financial results in the quarter when compared to our forward-looking guidance provided on our April earnings call, resulting in a benefit of $0.27 on diluted earnings per share. These included a $3.2 billion gain from our investment in Anthropic and lower-than-expected expenses related to the voluntary retirement program, which were partially offset by severance expense and impairment charges in Xbox.
When adjusting for these items, we exceeded expectations across revenue, operating income and earnings per share due to strong demand and execution in the quarter. Company gross margin percentage was 67%, down year over year, driven by sales mix shift to Azure as well as continued investments in AI infrastructure and growing product usage, partially offset by ongoing efficiency gains, particularly in Azure and M365.
Commercial Cloud operating expenses increased 10%, driven by continued investment in R&D, compute capacity, talent and data to support product development across the portfolio. SG&A growth was impacted by a low prior-year comparable as well as some of the discrete items mentioned earlier. Operating margins increased slightly year over year to 45%.
Total company headcount declined 2% year over year when adjusted for the impact of our investments in OpenAI. Other income and expense was $2.8 billion, driven by the gain on investment in Anthropic noted earlier.
Capital expenditures were $41 billion, including the impact from higher component pricing. As noted in our guide, roughly two-thirds of our CapEx was for short-lived assets, primarily CPUs and GPUs as customers increasingly build solutions that leverage both AI and non-AI infrastructure. The remaining spend was for long-lived assets.
This quarter, total finance leases were $5.6 billion and were primarily for large data center sites, and cash paid for PP&E was $35.8 billion. Cash flow from operations was $55.4 billion, up 30%, driven by strong cloud billings and collections, partially offset by an increase in operating lease payments. And free cash flow was $19.6 billion, reflecting higher capital expenditures.
And finally, we returned $10.2 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases, bringing our total cash return to shareholders to over $43 billion for the full fiscal year.
Now to our commercial results. Commercial bookings grew 18% when excluding the impact from OpenAI, driven by strong execution in our core annuity sales motions and reflecting broad customer demand across geographies and customer segments. Bookings increased 10% and 11% in constant currency when including Azure commitments from OpenAI.
Commercial remaining performance obligation grew 84% to $678 billion. All sequential commercial RPO growth was driven by commitments from customers outside of frontier model companies, and RPO increased 25% when excluding OpenAI. RPO including OpenAI has a weighted average duration of 2.3 years, and roughly 30% will be recognized in revenue in the next 12 months, up 37% year over year. The remaining portion recognized beyond the next 12 months increased 112%.
Microsoft Cloud revenue was $59.3 billion and grew 27%, reflecting strong demand across Azure and our first-party AI applications and services. And for the full year, our cloud revenue surpassed $214 billion, with nearly 90% from customers outside of frontier model companies. Microsoft Cloud gross margin percentage was better than expected at 65% and down year over year, driven by a sales mix shift to Azure as well as continued investments in AI infrastructure and increased product usage, partially offset by ongoing efficiency gains noted earlier.
Now to our segment results. Revenue from productivity and business processes was $37.8 billion and grew 14%. M365 Commercial Cloud revenue increased 16% on an adjusted basis when normalized for the prior year comparable that benefited from 2 points of in-period revenue recognition, and on a reported basis, revenue growth was 14%.
Building on our Copilot momentum from Q3, net paid seat adds more than doubled sequentially, with paid seats now over 30 million. Premium offerings including Copilot E5 and early traction in E7 drove ARPU growth this quarter. And paid M365 commercial seats grew 6% year over year, with installed base expansion across all customer segments, though primarily in our small and medium business and frontline worker offerings.
M365 commercial products revenue increased 19%, ahead of expectations, driven by large, long-duration M365 contracts that resulted in higher in-period revenue recognition from the Windows commercial on-premises component. M365 Consumer Cloud revenue increased 24% and 22% in constant currency, again driven by ARPU growth, and M365 consumer subscriptions grew 7%.
LinkedIn revenue increased 12% and 10% in constant currency, primarily driven by Marketing Solutions. Dynamics 365 revenue increased 13% and 12% in constant currency against a strong prior-year comparable. Bookings growth in ERP remains healthy, while CRM continued to moderate with longer sales cycles.
Segment gross margin dollars increased 14% and 13% in constant currency, and gross margin percentage decreased slightly with increased M365 Copilot usage as we continue to invest in product quality and drive further efficiency gains. Operating expenses increased 11%, primarily driven by the shared R&D investments mentioned earlier. Operating income increased 15% and 14% in constant currency, and operating margins increased year over year to 58%.
Next, the Intelligent Cloud segment revenue was $39.3 billion and grew 32% and 31% in constant currency. In Azure and other cloud services, revenue grew 43% against a prior year that included accelerating growth. Customer demand continues to exceed available capacity.
Revenue growth was ahead of expectations, driven by efficiency gains across our CPU and GPU fleet as well as process improvements to enable earlier delivery of new capacity. That additional in-quarter capacity for Azure was quickly monetized. Results also benefited from stronger-than-expected GitHub Copilot consumption following the June business model change to align pricing with usage and value.
In our on-premises server business, revenue was relatively unchanged year over year and was down 1% in constant currency. Results were ahead of expectations, primarily driven by renewals with higher in-period revenue recognition from the mix of contracts.
Segment gross margin dollars increased 24%, and gross margin percentage decreased year over year, primarily driven by a sales mix shift to Azure as well as the continued scaling of our AI infrastructure ahead of growing demand, partially offset by ongoing efficiency gains in Azure. Segment gross margins were also impacted by growing GitHub Copilot usage, though margins improved through the quarter with the June business model change to usage-based pricing.
Operating expenses increased 10%, driven by shared R&D investments noted earlier. Operating income grew 31%, and operating margins, with a strong focus on efficiencies and investment returns, were relatively unchanged year over year at 41%.
Now, More Personal Computing revenue was $12.9 billion and declined 4% and 5% in constant currency. Windows OEM and devices revenue decreased 7%, and Windows OEM decreased 5%, driven by lower PC market demand and a high prior-year comparable that benefited from Windows 10 end-of-support. Results were ahead of expectations as OEM and channel partners continued to build inventory given increasing component prices.
Search advertising revenue ex-TAC increased 10% and 9% in constant currency, with growth driven by higher revenue per search across Edge and Bing as well as higher volume. The growth was impacted by third-party partnerships.
And Xbox revenue decreased 10% and 11% in constant currency. Xbox content and services revenue decreased 10% against a prior-year comparable that benefited from strong first-party content performance.
Segment gross margin dollars decreased 2% and gross margin percentage increased year over year driven by lower amortization from the Activision acquisition. Operating expenses increased 8% and 7% in constant currency, driven by the continued investments and shared R&D noted earlier as well as impairment charges in Xbox. Operating income decreased 14% and 15% in constant currency and operating margins decreased year over year to 21%.
Now before I move to outlook, effective at the start of FY27, we are extending the estimated useful life of our data centers and office buildings from 15 to 25 years, reflecting our operating history and expected use of these assets. The impact of this update is reflected in today's guidance. This change affects only the timing of future depreciation and is expected to have a minimal benefit to FY27 operating income.
The greater impact is on capital expenditures as more of our future data center leases will shift from finance leases to operating leases as a result of this update. Finance leases are included in capital expenditures, while operating leases are not. Outside of this useful life impact, our calendar year 2026 CapEx investment expectations remain unchanged. However, the shift from finance to operating leases adjusts our expectation to approximately $175 billion.
Now moving to our outlook. Let me start with some full year commentary for FY27. First some reminders: in both M365 commercial products and server products, we are lapping higher transactional purchasing from the timing of product launches and expect revenue from both to decline in the mid-single digits for the full fiscal year.
Growth in Windows OEM and devices will be impacted by lower PC market demand as higher component costs increase device pricing, a prior-year comparable that benefited from Windows 10 end of support and elevated inventory levels. As a result, we expect revenue to decline in the high teens for the fiscal year.
Moving to FX, assuming current rates remain stable, we now expect FX to decrease full year fiscal revenue growth by less than one point with no meaningful impact to COGS and operating expense growth at the company level.
With strong commercial momentum, we continue to expect another fiscal year of double-digit revenue and operating income growth. Operating expenses should grow in the mid- to high-single digits, reflecting continued investment in R&D, compute capacity, talent and data. And we expect FY27 capital expenditures will grow year over year given demand signals across our portfolio.
Even as we invest to meet growing demand, full fiscal year operating margins should be down less than a point. In addition, we expect to remain free cash flow positive in FY27. And finally, we expect our FY27 effective tax rate to be approximately 20%.
Now to the outlook for our first quarter, which unless specifically noted otherwise is on a US dollar basis. Based on current rates, we expect FX to decrease total revenue growth by less than one point with no meaningful impact to COGS or operating expense growth.
Within the segments, we expect FX to decrease revenue growth in Productivity and Business Processes by roughly one point and Intelligent Cloud by less than one point. There is no meaningful impact in More Personal Computing.
Starting with our commercial business and commercial bookings. When adjusted for the impact from OpenAI, we expect healthy growth on a growing expiry base driven by strong execution across our core annuity sales motions. As a reminder, the significant OpenAI contract signed in the prior year will result in some quarterly volatility in both bookings and RPO growth rates. Microsoft cloud gross margin percentage should be relatively stable quarter over quarter.
Now to segment guidance in productivity and business processes, we expect revenue of $36.7 to $37 billion US dollars or growth of 11 to 12%. In M365 Commercial Cloud, we expect growth of approximately 16% in constant currency on an adjusted basis, which normalizes for the prior year comparable that benefited from one point of in-period revenue recognition or 15% on a reported basis.
The sequential growth from our momentum in Copilot E5 and E7 is mitigated a bit by the lower ARPU new seat adds in frontline worker and small and medium business SKUs. With the premium SKU momentum and the increased monetization opportunity from adding usage-based billing products alongside per-seat licensing in July, we expect to see acceleration in M365 commercial cloud revenue growth through this fiscal year.
M365 commercial product revenue should grow in the mid-single digits driven by the timing of long-duration M365 contracts, partially offset by the impact from the prior year comparable noted earlier. M365 consumer cloud revenue should grow in the mid-teens, down sequentially as we lap the benefit from last year's price increase. Growth will again be driven by ARPU and an increase in subscription volume.
For LinkedIn, we expect revenue growth in the high single digits and in Dynamics 365, we expect revenue growth to be in the low teens, relatively stable quarter over quarter driven by continued growth in ERP, although impacted by the bookings trends noted earlier.
For Intelligent Cloud, we expect revenue of $40.95 to $41.25 billion US dollars or growth of 33 to 34%. In Azure, we expect revenue growth of approximately 45% in constant currency. And we remain focused on delivering efficiencies that help us bridge the gaps we see as customer demand continues to exceed supply.
Even with the strong close to Q4, we continue to expect H1 growth to accelerate. And as a reminder, year-over-year Azure growth rates can vary quarter to quarter based on capacity, timing and contract mix. In our on-premises server business, we expect revenue to decline in the low to mid-single digits with ongoing customer shift to cloud offerings and the prior year comparable noted earlier.
In More Personal Computing, we expect revenue to be $12.2 to $12.7 billion US dollars as we continue to lap strong prior year comparables noted earlier and navigate complex PC market dynamics impacted by component prices and inventory levels. Windows OEM and devices revenue should decline in the low 20s driven by the market dynamics noted earlier. As in prior quarters, the range of potential outcomes remains wider than normal.
Search advertising revenue ex-TAC growth should be in the mid-single digits, down sequentially due to the impact of third-party partnerships. Growth will continue to be driven by consistent trends in revenue per search and volume. And in Xbox Content Services, we expect revenue to decline in the mid-single digits. Hardware revenue should decline year over year.
Therefore at the total company level, revenue should be between $89.85 and $90.95 billion US dollars or growth of 16 to 17%. With accelerating commercial growth partially offset by the impact from the PC market dynamics noted earlier.
We expect COGS of $29.6 to $29.8 billion US dollars or growth of 23 to 24% and operating expense of $16.8 to $16.9 billion US dollars, a growth of 7 to 8% driven by continued investment in R&D, compute capacity and talent. Operating margins should be relatively flat year over year, excluding any impact from our investments in OpenAI.
Other income and expenses expected to be roughly negative $100 million as interest income will be more than offset by interest expense, which includes the interest payments related to data center finance leases and we expect our Q1 effective tax rate to be approximately 20%.
Next capital expenditures, we expect CapEx spend will be over $50 billion, including the lease reclassification impact from the useful life update.
In closing in FY26, we delivered accelerating revenue and operating income growth while expanding operating margins. Our execution across sales and product engineering strengthened through the second-half of the year. As we begin FY27, we remain focused on delivering products that create meaningful return on investment for our customers, which will result in durable long term growth for Microsoft and our shareholders. With that, let's go to Q&A. Jonathan.
Jonathan Raa
Thanks, Amy. We'll now move over to Q&A. Out of respect for others on the call, we request that participants please only ask one question. Operator, can you please repeat your instructions?
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, if you would like to ask a question, please press *1 on your telephone keypad and a confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press *2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue for participants using speaker equipment and may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. One moment please while we poll for questions. And our first question comes from Karl Keirstead with UBS, please proceed.
Karl Keirstead
OK, great. Thank you. Satya maybe I'll start away from the numbers and ask if you could spend a minute and elaborate on your opening comments about model choice and the protection of corporate IP. Maybe I could ask this in two parts. First, how material do you think traction could be for open and custom models over the next year or two, knowing that many enterprises might be initially reticent to use open models? And secondly, how exactly does Microsoft benefit from this shift knowing that you've also got fairly large Frontier Lab exposure? Thanks so much.
Satya Nadella
Thank you, Karl. So the way we are coming at this is at the end of the day, the goal is to have the firm be in control of their own destiny in terms of what I describe as building their human capital and their token capital, right? So at the end of the day, if a firm is a learning machine, they need their own learning machine. And that's sort of really the goal and the models are an input, not some extraction of the knowledge of the enterprise.
But in some sense you have to really at the end of the day, every firm is going to evaluate who are the providers who are helping them with their outcomes and their knowledge creation. I think that that is now fairly clear and it's going to become clear by the day. This is not going to be about, you know, come in and take all my knowledge and benefit yourself, whereas I am not getting anything out of it.
So given that direction of travel, we are very, very clear about the architectural sort of design of the platform, which is you've got to keep your harness separate from the model when the harness will ensure that your memory, your context, all of that is external. That means any given model at any given time is swappable. You should and you can use Frontier models. There's no reason not to. But you also can use multiple of them, right?
So if you look at some of the stats I gave, it's a great example of how to use the frontier models for what they deliver, how to use low cost models for what they deliver. And in fact train your own model when you don't want to use any external model itself. Because after all, you have all the outputs, you have all the traces, you have all the context.
That's really the enterprise design architecture that we are going to evangelize. We ourselves are using it. Copilot is built that way. GitHub copilot is built that way. Our security copilot is built that way. And we want to democratize that design pattern so that every enterprise can use it.
And within there, there will be a mix of open weights, closed weights. And by the way, you know, one of the things that's least talked about is remember, right, if you look even at the Hugging Face incident, the biggest thing that we should take away from that is you can't sort of depend on any one model. You will maybe need multiple models to even remediate some challenges that get caused by one model, right?
That's the way to think about it, right? Because you can't be subject to the refusals of one model. So there's a lot more design space here. We talk about the frontier as if it's one thing. The frontier is about every firm having a frontier and the choice, the cost control and the capability that they need in order to be able to control their destiny.
Amy Hood
And I think maybe, Karl, just to add a little bit to the end of your question, which is that it's why it's important that the platform is built. And I think Satya mentioned this in his comments to be able to deliver the right model for the right job on the architecture called Azure. And so given that we continue to see growing demand, no matter what model is chosen or what model family or whether it's run a model of your own, the Azure platform is quite efficient at delivering that. So thinking about that infrastructure as being pretty fungible.
Karl Keirstead
Very helpful. Thanks.
Jonathan Raa
Thanks, Karl. Operator, next question please.
Operator
The next question comes from the line of Brent Thill with Jefferies. Please proceed.
Brent Thill
Thanks, Amy. Impressive acceleration in Azure up to 43% going to mid 40s. I guess the questions around the underlying drivers would you and Satya are seeing in terms of just what's driving this and many of the questions around capacity constraints are, are we just still in the same environment or is this Microsoft just executing better given given the constraints we're all seeing? Thanks.
Amy Hood
Thanks, Brent. First, there are still constraints in the system. I think we've continued to say, I think now for a number of quarters that demand continues to exceed available supply and that certainly remains true. You can even see it I think in some of the pricing that's occurring in the spot market for assets.
So when you think about being able to deliver better, the first thing we focus on, and I tried to talk a little bit about it in my prepared remarks, is efficiency. Being able to get more out of everything that we've got in the fleet. That applies to efficiency gains in the CPU fleet. It's going to be efficiency gains in the GPU fleet. We saw good work this quarter in particular from our engineering teams to make as much of that available as we could.
And because of the supply demand imbalance we've been talking about, when we can make efficiency gains, they are quickly monetized in the quarter. And I think that dynamic certainly impacted the quarter positively.
I would also say some of the process improvements we've made to make sure both CPU and GPU, just the lead time from how quickly we can get things to simplify it tremendously plugged in was also improved over the past 90 days. And so those improvements again are very quickly monetized when we're able to do that.
And at the scale that we're operating in terms of across the entire hyperscale fleet making efficiency improvements that can be quickly monetized as a result and acceleration in the quarter, it's part of also what we expect to see and talk about with the Q1.
Brent Thill
Thanks, Brent.
Jonathan Raa
Operator, next question please.
Operator
The next question comes from the line of Mark Moerdler with Bernstein Research. Please proceed.
Mark Moerdler
Thank you very much for taking my question and congratulations on the solid, really great quarter. Satya, Amy, sentiment around AI remains incredibly volatile with concerns about oversupply coming as well as concerns about component pricing increasing impacting margins. Amy, 2 related questions. How does Microsoft protect itself if there really is overcapacity and over building of data centers or over building of chips, etcetera? And on the flip side of that, how do you manage through the hardware pricing increases that we're seeing the component prices and that it doesn't just drive you to either massively drive up the price of your offerings or or negatively impact your margins? Thank you.
Amy Hood
Thanks. Mark, the questions are, are a little bit related, but I'll, I'll start with maybe the first. You know, currently the situation is obviously that demand exceeds available supply in a sort of relatively extreme moment. But when you start to think about over the duration, I try to remind people, you know, a lot of the expense especially you see it in CapEx, you've seen our CapEx really pivot toward what I would call and do call short lived assets, which really right, that's CPUs and GPUs that have relatively shorter lead times.
And so if the demand environment changes, you just slow down what is in fact the largest component, right. And the driver of COGS, the investment into land and data center builds is actually quite flexible, right. It's a smaller percentage of the overall cost structure and it can be timing can be changed on much of that, especially on the builds or you can stagger the timing of the build out of as I was saying, some of the GPUs and CPUs that you plan to put in.
And so when you think about being able to manage through that, hyperscalers have been doing that for quite a long time in terms of having the flexibility and the understanding of manage those changes in demand. And the other thing is that's important, Mark, is you just have an incredibly diverse book of business by Geo, by segment, by industry. And I feel like when you look even at our backlog or what we added in RPO this quarter, it is from the breadth of really the Microsoft product portfolio as well as our customer portfolio.
So when you have the ability to late bind some of the more expensive components in short term, you have a big book of business that's flexible. You have a big first party app business that also uses the capacity that you're building out in addition to your Azure platform. It does allow us to have a lot more flexibility to manage through those.
When it comes to the pricing question, I think that's really impacting everybody equivalently in so many ways. What we've been trying to do of course at this point is to just make sure that we're doing the best efficiency work we can so we can continue to give customers great value. We're reminding people that frankly the cloud offers tremendous benefits versus having to make these purchases as servers on Prem yourself where the price increases are even more hard for customers. So the cloud still provides a great ROI in those types of situations.
And you know we're adding this capacity to your point, but a lot of this obviously is also being sold in newer contracts and we're able to have the pricing reflected to keep value. You know, listen, for the long term you want to have pricing work for customers and for you. And so we're trying to stay focused on that as well.
Satya Nadella
And if I just add to Amy's comments, I thought—and he captured it well—that all of us are reading this 1873 as the book to be read. And so in my mind, I think you've got to get the product shape right. That's sort of a lot of what we are focused on. You have to get the portfolio right. Amy talked about how what we're doing—whether it's in Copilot or the Super app, bringing together all the form factors, all the way to Azure and the agent-first primitives in Azure—you kind of have to really get that portfolio to all come together.
The mix of customers is super important. You have to recognize the breadth, the geographic mix, the segment mix, the workload mix, and you really have to think about all of those when you're even building capacity. And then, at the end of the day, you've got to run an efficient railroad. You do need to—you know, Amy talked a little bit about even in the last quarter how we've improved on the efficiency front. It's not something that'll just show up at the end. You have to sort of monotonically work at it.
And so we are very focused on all those, and then we know that there will be, you know, ups and downs in terms of where we are in the cycle, but the secular shift is clear, and we're very bullish about us coming with the right sort of mix of business and the right margin structure—and most importantly, with the right value for our customers.
Mark Moerdler
Excellent, thank you so much.
Jonathan Raa
Thanks, Mark. Operator, next question please.
Operator
The next question comes from the line of Adam Wood with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed.
Adam Wood
Hi, good evening. Thanks for taking the question, and also congratulations to you on a very strong end of the year. I wanted to maybe just ask about M365 Copilots—obviously very strong momentum there with over 30 million paid seats and strong acceleration. Could you just talk a little bit about how you're seeing customers move from pilots to broader deployments here? Is this still a pilot-driven motion, or are we seeing a lot more broad-based deployments? And then, when we think about monetization of the product—in terms of additional seats, migration to higher-value SKUs like E7, and consumption—what do you see as the main driver of monetization going forward? Thank you.
Satya Nadella
No, thank you, Adam, for that question. So let me start, and then Amy can add. I think, yeah, it starts again with that product shape. As you can see, even within the quarter, the product shape has changed pretty dramatically, right? So we now have chat, co-work, autopilot, code—all coming onto essentially what is going to become this flagship super app that various roles can use.
And if you think about even the usage side, that's a place where, again, there’s a lot of interesting data, right? The time to usage has drastically come down—from what used to take months or days, right? So from when a license is purchased to when it’s actually used, the intensity of usage itself has increased significantly. I mean, we’re talking about usage intensity that’s on par with everyday communication tools like Outlook or Teams.
The second point I’d make is about the overall enterprise integration of this, right? It’s not some isolated tool—it’s deeply wired in. You mentioned E7, for example—it’s integrated into governance components via Agent 365, so your IT Ops, Sec Ops, and Fin Ops are all connected, along with all your business processes.
So, for instance, your CRM system, your ERP system—all of them are essentially skills and plugins that plug directly into core workflows. That allows you to take enterprise-wide workflows and integrate them into the Super App, right? That drives higher usage, and it all compounds.
Then there’s the business model. We now have a per-seat business model—and we also now have a usage-based business model. So it’s seat plus usage. We’re already seeing the ARPU growth driven by things like E7, but really, as we deliver more value and better customer outcomes at the enterprise level.
In fact, historically speaking, Office was much narrower compared to what Copilot is today. This is the first time we truly have an enterprise-wide tool that combines both per-seat and usage-based pricing. So the total addressable market (TAM) is far more expansive. They’ll be very, very focused on driving customer value and expanding alongside it.
Amy Hood
Yeah, Adam—I think I touched on this a bit in my prepared remarks, but what we’ve been saying is that over the course of this year, some of the ARPU growth came from E5 plus the Copilot license that Satya mentioned. We’ll see even more from E7, which offers particularly compelling value in its Agent 365 component—specifically, as Satya highlighted, integrating Sec Ops and Fin Ops. Think about it: everyone will need both observability and manageability of token spend across all business processes, and that’s exactly what E7 delivers.
And so, E7 was only on the market for part of the quarter, and I think we were quite encouraged by the value customers saw in that SKU. I believe we’ll continue focusing on it throughout the year. Finally, what Satya is referring to is this expanding TAM that grows over the course of the year. When I think about that expansive TAM, that’s really where we’re seeing this usage- and consumption-driven growth. As more of these experiences get integrated and as IT becomes more involved in the process, it’ll significantly shift how people perceive M365 capabilities.
Satya Nadella
It’ll be fun for you, Adam. I recall one of your colleagues published an ROIC document. So I took that PDF document and gave it to Copilot, asking it to essentially build me a new Power BI dashboard. Here’s the thing: it built a rich semantic model that connected to my Fabric environment, pulling in data from external sources—including up-to-date SEC filings for all the MAG 7 companies. On top of that, the code repository itself is in GitHub, but the resulting artifact is hosted as a site in my environment.
To me, that’s a classic example of an enterprise-wide workflow. As a knowledge worker, I could create a dashboard. The data engineer can go into Fabric and locate the artifact. The professional developer can go to the GitHub repo and find the code. And by the way, it’s all registered with Agent 365—that’s a bit of what Amy was describing: the convergence of a new way of working, while simultaneously embedding IT security and manageability.
Adam Wood
That's very helpful. Thank you.
Jonathan Raa
Thanks, Adam. Operator, next question, please.
Operator
The next question comes from the line of Brad Zelnick with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed.
Brad Zelnick
Great. Thank you so much for taking my question. Satya. Appreciating cybersecurity is so core to everything Microsoft does. The playing field shifted recently with the latest Frontier model releases and this week you introduced Project Perception. Can you expand on what this moment means for your cyber business explicitly and also what it means for trust in Microsoft more broadly? Thanks.
Satya Nadella
Yeah, thank you for that question. I think you're right about saying that the entire—I would say the overall physics of how both what is needed in terms of the cyber product and even the cyber operations, because at the end of the day, you kind of have to sort of transform yourself on both the products and also how you operate as a company to protect yourself—have changed pretty dramatically.
So what we are focused on is first, again, taking the same approach we've taken for knowledge work or coding, which is you've got to start with an intelligence-first, model-forward approach. And so what we launched with Perception is essentially saying, let's really make sure that you have the red team agents that know how to find—constantly red-teaming and identifying vulnerabilities. Then you have the blue team agent that is constantly triaging, and the green team that fixes. So you kind of create your own agentic system that's continuously operating to create the cyber defense you need.
It definitely feeds off of all the signals, right—whether it's the Defender's identity, Entrust signal, Defender signal, network signal, app security signal—all of that helps provide the context so you can truly create the protection.
The other thing they've also said is that especially in cyber, it becomes critical to have that multi-model approach—not just for cost. In fact, we proved with the data in Cyber Gym that you can achieve the same level of performance with 50% less cost thanks to this Mai Cyber Flash One. And the reason is because 90% of the tasks are handled by the Cyber Flash One model, and only 10% of the tasks still require the frontier model, right? So this is that mix of using the right model for the right task within what is essentially a pipeline job—a super important characteristic.
And so to us, I think this is an important piece. The other thing I'd say is from a resilience perspective—if, for whatever reason, a given model goes away, you can't be left high and dry. You need to be able to continue your cyber operations. And that's the other piece. So both cost and resilience are important criteria, and that's what we're trying to build in—whether it's in code, whether it's in cyber, or whether it's in knowledge work. And we're very excited about Perception and what it means, quite frankly, for our security business going forward.
Brad Zelnick
Super helpful. Thank you.
Jonathan Raa
Thanks, Brad. Operator, we have time for one last question.
Operator
And the last question will come from the line of Gabriela Borges with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed.
Gabriela Borges
Hey, good afternoon. Thank you. And I wanted to ask you about ROI—you've given us color on the CapEx side of the equation and on the monetization side as well. Maybe put those two pieces together for us. When you look at and track ROI on the CapEx decisions you're making today, how does that compare to a year ago? And what are some of the levers you can still pull—perhaps from internal silicon, for example—as a driver of incremental monetization going forward? Thank you.
Amy Hood
Thanks, Gabriela. You know, I don't think my math has really changed over the past year, quite frankly, in terms of how I calculate it. I’d say the way to think about it for me is more about the confidence in TAM expansion and the margin levers we have, both from product improvements and infrastructure improvements. We’ve already discussed some of these on the call today—the levers we have to keep driving efficiencies across both the application layer and the infrastructure layer of the stack.
But you're right—we didn’t touch on all the pieces. I think Satya actually commented on a number of them. We still have opportunities, obviously, as we continue to seek the best price-performance on silicon, including our investments in first-party solutions. Frankly, work on model diversification also presents a margin improvement opportunity—being able to deliver the best possible outcome with greater efficiency, both in terms of token usage and cost structure, which are also margin levers.
All of these factors clearly contribute, as you pointed out, to our increased confidence in ROIC—frankly, in the dollars we’re investing and will continue to invest going forward. And as we consider the portfolio mix, having a fairly broad pool across knowledge work, coding, security, and essentially the agent layer—I’ll call that Agent 365; it’s kind of a shortcut—but all of that also represents an opportunity.
And then, of course, there’s what we discussed on the Azure side regarding model efficiency, silicon and component efficiency—including our investments in first-party solutions—and just the overall efficiency of operating at hyperscale. So we have quite a few levers to keep driving improvement, and that’s where our focus lies. But as Satya mentioned, this is grind work—it’s about getting a little better every day, and we’re actually quite good at that grind and ensuring we can deliver those gains for customers.
Gabriela Borges
That all makes sense. Thank you.
Jonathan Raa
Thanks, Gabriela. That wraps up the Q&A portion of today's earnings call. Thank you for joining us today, and we look forward to speaking with all of you soon. Thank you very much.
Operator
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time and enjoy the rest of your day.
Details at Microsoft IR
Tips: This summary was generated by an AI language model based on publicly available information, including auto-generated subtitles and publicly released audio from third-party sources. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, AI-generated content may contain errors or omissions. Please refer to the official materials released by the respective listed companies for the most accurate and up-to-date information. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any investment products. The views and summaries presented do not reflect the official position of moomoo. Moomoo makes no warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of this content and shall not be held liable for any losses arising from its use. The copyright of any original conference call content remains with the respective listed companies.
Disclaimer: Moomoo Technologies Inc. is providing this content for information and educational use only.Read more
Heart
31
Thumbs Up
42
Respect
7
Lol
3
Emm
2
1.7M Views
Report
Comments (187)
Write a Comment...
187
85
13