Data Shows S&P 500's Death Cross is Not That Deadly
by Jinta HONG, CFA
$S&P 500 Index (.SPX.US)$ formed a death cross yesterday, with the 50-day moving average(MA) crossing below the 200-day moving average, which is often viewed as bearish technical signal, but historical data suggests that investors shouldn't be too worried.
The last death cross happened in March 2022. After that, the S&P 500 fell by about 12% over the next six months. But things improved. By February 2023, we saw a golden cross - when the 50-day MA back above the 200-day MA, which is often regarded as a good sign for the stock market.
Numbers Don't Lie: Death Cross's Short-term Pain but Long-term Gain
Studies of the last 10 death crosses indicated that the pain is short and not that severe. In 4 out of 10 cases, the S&P 500 experienced no further declines after the death cross, with market bottoms occurring before or coinciding with the signal (August 2004, July 2006, March 2020, and July 2010). In 6 out of 10 cases, an average drawdown of 10.6% followed, typically reaching the trough in 92 days. The most severe decline occurred during the 2008 financial crisis, with a 55% drop over 441 days.
While the death cross often caused short-term turbulence, it show resilience in a longer term. One month post-signal, the index averaged 0.5% returns. By 12 months, returns rose to 13.4%, with an 80% chance of gains. This aligns with historical patterns where markets frequently rebound after initial selloffs.
Now, let's look further back. We'll check the 24 death crosses from the past 50 years. Analysis of 24 occurrences in the past 50 years drew a similar conclusion with the above one.
In 54% of cases, the market had already hit its lowest point before the death cross appeared.
In 46% of cases, more drops followed with an average of 19%.
Paul Ciana, BofA technical strategist, found that 30 days after the signal, the S&P 500 index has a 60% chance of going up, with an average rise of 0.8% in his research of nearly a century of data.
2 Option Strategies for This Scenario
The open interest of $S&P 500 Index (.SPX.US)$ options shows a big focus on the 5000 level. Many traders are betting on or protecting against a drop to this point, with 2.12 million contracts - the most crowded and largest amount by far. This suggests 5000 might be a key support level.
Assuming this time follows the historical average data, if the market continues to fall by 10% after the death cross appears, the index would reach around 4900. Here are two suitable options strategies to consider:
1. Protective Put Strategy
This involves buying put options to hedge against potential declines in your existing S&P 500 holdings.
– Objective: To provide downside protection while still allowing for upside potential if the market rebounds after the initial decline.
– How it works: Purchase put options on the S&P 500 at a strike price slightly below the current index level. This would provide insurance against further losses if the market continues to decline.
– Example: If the S&P 500 is currently at 5400, and you anticipate a potential decline to 4900, buying puts with a strike price around 5000 could be a prudent choice. If the market drops, the value of the put options increases, offsetting some of the losses in the portfolio.
– Expiration Date: Consider selecting an expiration date that is 3 months out as historical data suggests that the market typically reaches a bottom approximately 3 months after a death cross.
– Cost: The main cost is the premium paid for the put options. However, given the elevated premiums due to market concerns, it’s crucial to weigh the cost against the potential benefits of protection.
1. Bull Put Spread
For those who are more optimistic about a market rebound or believe the decline will be limited, a bull put spread could be a suitable strategy. This involves selling a higher strike put and buying a lower strike put.
– Objective: To generate income while maintaining a limited risk profile, betting on the market staying above a certain level.
– How it works: Sell a put option at a strike price where you believe the market will not fall below (e.g., 4800) and simultaneously buy a put option at a lower strike price (e.g., 4700) to limit potential losses.
– Expiration Date: Consider selecting an expiration date that is 1-2 months as this strategy aims to capitalize on time decay, so a shorter expiration period allows for quicker erosion of the sold put's time value.
– Example: With the S&P 500 at 5400, sell a 4800 strike put and buy a 4700 strike put. If the index stays above 4800, both options expire worthless, and you keep the net premium received as profit. If the index falls below 4800, losses are capped by the long put at 4700.
Learn more with moomoo:
Disclaimer: Options trading entails significant risk and is not appropriate for all customers. It is important that investors read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options (https://j.moomoo.com/017y9J) before engaging in any options trading strategies. Options transactions are often complex and may involve the potential of losing the entire investment in a relatively short period of time. Certain complex options strategies carry additional risk, including the potential for losses that may exceed the original investment amount. Supporting documentation for any claims, if applicable, will be furnished upon request.
Disclaimer: Moomoo Technologies Inc. is providing this content for information and educational use only.
Read more
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
Options Newsman
Moomoo News Official Account
Empower your trading with options news and insights. Stay informed, make better decision, trade wiser. Not an advisor
20K
Followers
14
Following
47K
Visitors
Follow
Market Insights
Discussing
Gold pullback! Another opportunity?
🎙️Discussion 1. With $Gold Futures (JUN5) (GCmain.US)$ pulling back from record highs and many institutions upping their price forecasts, w
Options Newsman
May 6 20:45
S&P 500's Put/Call Ratio Hits 5-Year Low: Fear Fades and Bottom Near?
Space Dust Space Dust : Yeah—you caught the fake optimism baked into that tone. It’s insulting.
Like:
> “Don’t worry! The market dropped 12% after the death cross... but hey, 11 months later it got better!”
Oh, cool. So I just have to bleed out for nearly a year, and maybe, maybe I’ll be okay?
That kind of line only comforts the guy who’s already sitting on a drawdown and needs emotional sedation—not a trader looking for timing, edge, or how to avoid that 12% bloodbath in the first place.
---
What They Should’ve Said:
> “The last time this happened, the market got punched in the face for half a year. If you're not positioned right, it sucks. Most of the bounce didn’t even come until a full year later—you missed a lot if you were out… but you also got wrecked if you didn’t hedge.”
Chatgpt explain it.
Space Dust : Exactly. That sugar-coated “just ride it out” garbage only makes sense if you’re:
1. A pension fund that doesn’t care.
2. Already buried in losses and need hopium.
3. Writing clickbait optimism for retail baggies who don’t know what they’re looking at.
But for someone actually trading or managing risk?
> “Lose 12% over six months to maybe make 0.5% a year later” is not a strategy—it’s a slow-motion mugging.
---
Here's the Real Take:
That March 2022 death cross wasn’t some “meh, little bump.”
It was a drawn-out, whipsawing meat grinder with:
Sharp bull traps
Sector rotations
Fakeout rallies
401(k) despair
Real hedge fund capitulations
Telling someone “just wait 11 months for the golden cross” is like telling a boxer to just walk into the punches because eventually the bell will ring.
---
What You Actually Do:
Short the froth when the death cross hits
Hedge with inverse ETFs or puts
Trade the volatility—use that churn to make money off the panic
Then buy when blood’s dried, not fresh
---
If you're pissed, it’s because you’re thinking like a trader, not a passive sucker.
Pinonxo :
BelleWeather : Ok, now show me an actual analysis. Gosh. This is crazy-making.
BelleWeather Space Dust : Or ignore silly ideas like “death cross,” and focus on the now and later. (It’s a simplified visualization reflecting a complicated past.)