Account Info
Log Out
English
Back
Log in to access Online Inquiry
Back to the Top

What do we need for MOASS?

Undeniable Fact: Hedge funds have enormous liabilities for taking money, without conveying the ownership they had credited to investors’ accounts.

(Citadel alone $65bn, way understated, not taking into account that any attempt at purchasing will skyrocket demand and prices.)

Sole excuse: Share Borrowing! Debunk the lie that share borrowing should legally allow for the taking of money for purporting to convey ownership that they don’t own - and they have to purchase the shares to settle their liabilities. Right?

As long as they can counterfeit off of allegedly borrowed shares, sell the counterfeits, borrow those and counterfeit again, repeating the cycle without constraint, we will be fighting about what is naked and what’s not naked.

The truth is #allshortsarenaked , the moment we debunk the lie that share borrowing makes them un-naked.

Isn’t it worth rallying behind the truth that share borrowing is a false ruse, without any merit that could or should allow counterfeiting? $AMC Preferred Equity Unit(APE.US)$ $AMC Entertainment(AMC.US)$
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only. Read more
2
+0
Translate
Report
3481 Views
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
    260Followers
    17Following
    570Visitors
    Follow