Account Info
Log Out
English
Back
Log in to access Online Inquiry
Back to the Top
Musk terminates Twitter deal: hero or zero?
Views 396K Contents 418

Lawyer's take on the Twitter v Elon Musk case, and strategies to take position

TLDR: The guaranteed winner of this case will be the LAWYERS LaughLaugh. But I do think that Twitter might win, so I want to take a position. After comparing the strategies I could use, I gone with the lower risk lower reward (max 8%) strategy, instead of the high risk high reward (max 200%) strategy.
Story time
After analysing the details and listening to lawyer YouTuber analysis on the case, I'm thinking Twitter will have a higher chance of winning, but who knows what will be the result.
What can we do if we think Twitter will win?
There are many ways to take position but I will talk about 3 of them.
1. Buying OTM CALL options (highest risk)
2. Buying stocks and HODL
3. Selling Deep OTM PUT options (lowest risk)
Assumption for discussion
For all the options, I will take the option that expire on 20 Jan 2023. Why? Because Oct 2022 is when the case will be heard, but there might be risk that the hearing could be delayed or after the hearing there might be appeal etc. So putting a 3 months buffer just in case. If you think that the case will drag longer, you can look at other options with longer expiry date.
*We will also assume if the deal doesn't go through, Twitter price will fall to $30 and stay that will till 20 Jan 2023.
Buying OTM CALL options (highest risk)
If Elon is forced to buy Twitter at $54.20, then the most profitable method to earn the most money out of it is to buy CALL options. This is because options gives you maximum leverage. It cost a fraction of the cost of the underlying shares, but you can get great exposure to the shares.
In this example I will use the CALL option with a strike price of $50, as seen here.
Lawyer's take on the Twitter v Elon Musk case, and strategies to take position
This option contract is selling for $140 each, and by buying it, you get to buy 100 shares of Twitter for $50 anytime on or before 20 Jan 2023. Which means if you have $5,040, you can buy 36 contracts which allows you to buy 3,600 shares of Twitter. If you were to buy the stocks, you can only get 126 shares. Now that is what we called leverage.
If the deal goes through, that means you earn $4.20 ($54.20 - $50) per share, which means you will earn 3,600 x $4.20 = $15,120. After deducting the $5,040 that you paid to buy the contracts, you will be left with a profit of $10,080. Now that is a 200% gain.
But the catch is that if the deal does not goes through*, or the acquisition price is changed to $50 or less, you will lose everything. All $5,040. Thus this is the highest risk option.
Buying stocks and HODL
The most common method that people use is to just buy the shares outright and HODL. With the current price of $40, that means you stand to gain a profit $14.20 per share.
With $5,040 we can buy 126 shares, which means we could net a profit of $1,789.20. A 35.5% gain, not bad. But if the deal falls through and share price drop to $30*. We will be losing $1,260, a 25% loss.
Selling Deep OTM PUT options (lowest risk)
The 3rd method here is to sell Cash Secure PUT option at a very low strike price. In this case a strike price of $25 which is $6 lower than the 52 weeks low. Just to be even safer.
Lawyer's take on the Twitter v Elon Musk case, and strategies to take position
This option contract is selling for $203 each and by selling it, the buyer get to sell you 100 shares of Twitter for $25 anytime on or before 20 Jan 2023. Which means for every contract sold, you might have to pay $2,500 for 100 shares, but you get to keep $203 for selling the contract.
With $5,000 you can sell 2 contract which in the worse case, you have to buy 200 shares of Twitter for $5,000, and the best case is that you keep $406 (8% gain) for free.
So if Elon is forced to buy Twitter at $54.20 each, then the buyer of this PUT option will just sell their share to Elon instead of you. So you can be sure that this contract will expire worthless.
But if the deal doesn't get through, so long Twitter share price stays above $25, you still keep the $406 for free. Otherwise, you will lose money, but you will lose less than if you were to own the shares outright because you get to keep the $406 regardless.
Position I have taken (lowest risk option)
As I'm not legally trained and I don't know how to gauge the chances of Twitter winning accurately, plus I don't mind owning Twitter share if it is dirt cheap though (i.e. $25). So I went with the lowest risk and lowest reward option LaughLaugh
Lawyer's take on the Twitter v Elon Musk case, and strategies to take position
Poll
Who are you rooting for? $Twitter (Delisted)(TWTR.US)$ or $Tesla(TSLA.US)$ ? You can vote in this post below too:
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only. Read more
1
8
+0
10
Translate
Report
66K Views
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
  • TeslaSmurf : Yes, I took position, though I know it will be a bumpy road: I shorted 250 stocks for now, STRAIGHT. 😂
    Elon will buy Twitter at 42$, but in order to do that he needs the shareholders to shit their pants at under 29$. In the opposite case (he walks away with a huge fine between 6 and 11 billion) he will sell his stake in Twitter and the price will crash to less than 25$. No hurry, anyway…
    Theoretically, the judge may sentence Elon to buy, but he doesn’t have any means to force him to do it… Menacing some jail? He just can avoid to enter Delaware and he’ll be fine 😂. For that reason, in case Elon can’t prove the BOTs being more than double of what Twitter DECLARED in the SEC filing, he may lose and get a huge fine corresponding to his DIRECT STAKE in the project (less than 10 billions), while the bank CAN’T be forced to finance the acquisition BY NO MEANS. So, at the end, Twitter will lose anyway, even if they get 10 billion because, at that point Elon will sell his shares and the price will crash.
    Just to speculate, Twitter may well use the 10 billion to buy back the stocks, but that would happen only months later than Elon’s selling…
    This is a pure GAMBLE, just for fun, as normally I ONLY trade and hold TSLA.
    In my modest opinion, the right move is to short it now, then buy it when Elon comes up with an offer or a settlement to buy it or, in the worst case scenario, after the legal battle CRASH (it WILL crash). In other words, short price: anywhere over 40$, buy price: anywhere under 25$. My next increase in the short will be over 42 $ to get a better cost average in the position.
    May I be totally wrong with the scenario’s picture ? I accept that case too, so I give it a 15% possibility: enough to try the short.

  • doctorpot1OP TeslaSmurf: As per WSB style, position or ban hahahaha LaughLaugh. But yea I think it is only fair if you show your short transaction if you had short.

    I won't discuss about what will happen as that is just speculation and I'm not legal train so I can only take advise from lawyers. But I think we can discuss on the setup you made.

    Hmm if you think Elon will buy at $42 why did you short it now at close to $40? That is an immediate $2 loss per share or $500 excluding the interest fee of 3%. No one will sell Twitter at $29 if the offer is $42. The price will go close to $42 instead. Because why sell at $29 when you wait for a while Elon will pay you $42?

    Do be careful when shorting this stock, cause if the judge rule in favor of Twitter, the price will immediately go close to $54.2. You will be losing around $14.2 per share or $3,550.

    Yea if the judge allows Elon to walks away using the termination clause then he have to pay Twitter the 1b fee, or if the judge allow him to walk away but he have to pay for the damages that means 6b to 11b goes into Twitter account. Share price would adjust to account for that free money too. So if you think the price will drop to $25 which means a market cap of 19b. Remember to add the free money in. I.e if the damages is 1b then the market cap will be 19+1 or a price of $26.66. If the damages is 11b then market cap will be 19+11b which mean a share price of $40.

    Why the damages need to be added to market cap? Cause that is how much the company value will grow by. If let's say my company is worth $1 with an asset of $1 and a share price of $1. If I get $1b in cash, it doesn't make sense for my share price to be below $1b, if not you just buy my share for $1, then you earned $1b in free money.

  • TeslaSmurf : You are right as long as you look at the bigger picture on the long term, bit to get there (to get the 42$ accepted by the board and by the shareholders), the stock price has to go UNDER 30$. That can happen as:
    • It is proven that the BOT size is over 10% (double of what DECLARED)
    • Elon walks away and sells his stake (even if he is heavily fined for around 10 billions).
    That’s my simple BET.

  • TeslaSmurf : I may cover it with a reasonable loss if I see the scenario changing, but for now that’s what I see and that’s where I put a little money.
    I don’t say things I don’t do.
    That’s an extract of my short term account at Schwab (as I can’t trade one moomoo).

  • doctorpot1OP TeslaSmurf: Nice Joyful Thanks for the transaction. I'm still confused about share price going to 30.

    If in the case, the final agreement is that Elon have to buy over at $42 a share, I doubt the share price will drop to $30 because that is 100% risk free profit and arbitrage will happen.

    let's say judge force Elon to buy at 42 a share. if Twitter drop to 30 a share, I will buy 100% of the company shares and immediately approve the merger and immediately earn 12 a share, 100% risk free. Therefore, what is more likely is that the price would hover closer to 42. maybe 40ish to account for shareholder rejecting the deal.

    Twitter will just hold the AGM to ask shareholder to approve or reject the offer.

  • doctorpot1OP TeslaSmurf: Respect CheerleadCheerlead There are too many people in moomoo that is all talk only LaughLaugh so I 100% respect users who put money where their mouth is, and that's why I always post my actual position and trades too.

    You sir deserve a salute Cool Guy

  • TeslaSmurf doctorpot1OP: The reason why the share will drop there (<30$) is that whenever Elon should present a second offer, it won’t be accepted if the price at that moment is already 39 or 41 just to say: shareholders must see a convenience, or the fear of losing their capital.

  • doctorpot1OP TeslaSmurf: The pricing model for a share price after an acquisition offer is made is just, share price = offer price - risk premium. Risk premium is to account for risk that the deal doesn't go through.

    Which we can see that when Musk first talk about buyout of Twitter for 54.20 the share price immediately goes up close to it at 51. Leaving 3.20 or 6% risk premium. However as Elon starts bashing Twitter and the possibility that this is another 420 buyout joke starts to sink in, the risk premium increased greatly and share price fell hard. Why? because investors believe this deal will not go through and it is yet another joke and market manipulation done by Elon.

    but if the court ordered Musk to buy Twitter as he does not have legal ground to exit the deal based on his "tons of bots" defence. Then the risk is now way lower. If the price is 42 like you said, I doubt the risk premium will be more than 12 as that is a 40% risk premium, for a deal that the judge had ruled in favor of Twitter.
    But that said, the risk premium could go damn high if Elon tweeted "F the judge I'm not going to comply", since he is basically the X factor here. Well known to be the rich billionaire that thinks that rules and law doesn't apply to him.

  • TeslaSmurf : Elon offered the 54,2 $ when the price was way lower exactly for the same reason: to remember to the shareholders what the price would be without him. And I don’t consider it a real and illegal manipulation as, right now, without Elon’s offer, the price would already be around 30$ (trending down) due to the general situation and to the not-brilliant Twitter’s finances. Let go the Bot PROBLEM (they will have to justify it to SEC, investors and advertisers). Elon offered 54,2 because he WANTS Twitter, no matter the cost and, by that time, at 42$ he might have faced some competition… not now, not with this market and also at 42$ no one else would buy it, as a sensate value could be 20-25 billions.

  • doctorpot1OP TeslaSmurf: he offer 54.2 not because he want people to remember what the price will be without him. That is basic of M&A, you gave to offer a premium so that most shareholder will accept the offer. if he offered 30, meh everyone will ignore him and the shares will just trade as per normal.

    Well we'll see how this goes, because this is going to set the precedence for all future cases. The precedence that any buyer who made an offer can just change their buy price at a lower price anytime they want when the market tanks, just by running out of the deal and the judge will allow them to buy at a lower price. Doubt that will happen, the judge will only say whether the exit is valid or not. they won't judge on whether Elon can reduce the buy price or not.
    Because if that happen, then any company can pull this trick. Virgin offer to buyout spaceX at 50 per share then later say I'm running out and offer 30. then I'm running out and offer 10. It is a dangerous precedence to be set for the entire country as then every company can abuse the system this way.

    the 42 case could still happen, but that will be a settlement out of court. which mean the judge won't be ruling at all as the case is settled out of court.

    but we'll see... the game will begin in Oct and we have placed our bets already hahahaha LaughLaugh and we both could still win our bet together. if price drop to anywhere from 23 to 39. You win, I also win. CheerleadCheerlead

avatar
Moo Contributor
crawled out of poverty, working towards FIRE!! (financial independence, retired early)
14KFollowers
103Following
15KVisitors
Follow